Bourbaki

Example 1

Tag 03TM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03TM].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits and direct limits

Let A, B be two sets, and let (Vα)α∈I(\mathrm{V}_\alpha)_{\alpha \in \mathrm{I}} be a family of subsets of A whose index set I is directed, and such that the relation α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta implies Vβ⊂Vα\mathrm{V}_\beta \subset \mathrm{V}_\alpha. Let Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha denote the set of all mappings of Vα\mathrm{V}_\alpha into B, and for each pair of indices (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) such that α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta let fβαf_{\beta\alpha} be the mapping of Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha into Eβ\mathrm{E}_\beta which sends each function u∈Eαu \in \mathrm{E}_\alpha to its restriction to Vβ\mathrm{V}_\beta. It is obvious that the conditions (LII)(\mathrm{LI_I}) and (LIII)(\mathrm{LI_{II}}) are satisfied, and the set E=lim→⁡Eα\mathrm{E} = \varinjlim \mathrm{E}_\alpha is called the set of germs of mappings of the Vα\mathrm{V}_\alpha into B. \* The most frequent case is that in which (Vα)(\mathrm{V}_\alpha) is the family of neighbourhoods of a subset of a topological space A (General Topology, Chapter I, §6, no. 10). \*

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.