Example 2
Tag 03TN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03TN].
Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits and direct limits
Suppose that, for each , is the same set F and that whenever , is the identity mapping of F onto itself. Then there exists a canonical bijection of onto F. In order to define , we have to form the set G which is the sum of the family ; G is therefore the union of a family of mutually disjoint sets, and for each there is a canonical bijection . We have next to consider the equivalence relation R on G corresponding to the partition , where is the set of all as runs through I. Clearly is a bijection whose inverse is the bijection required. We shall identify F with by means of this canonical bijection.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.