Example 4
Tag 03V3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03V3].
Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 1. Order relations. Ordered sets
In the set of sets of subsets of a set E, let be the set of partitions of E (Chapter II, § 4, no. 7). We recall that a partition is said to be coarser than a partition if given any there exists such that (Chapter II, § 4, no. 6). For each partition of E let be the graph of the equivalence relation defined by on E (Chapter II, § 6, no. 2), that is to say, the union of the (mutually disjoint) sets , where A runs through . The relation " is coarser than " is immediately seen to be equivalent to , and is therefore an order relation on the set between and .
An ordering on a set E is a correspondence with E as source and as target, and such that the relation is an order relation on E. By abuse of language we shall sometimes refer to the graph G of as an ordering on E. If is an order relation on E, it has a graph which is an ordering on E.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.