Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 0462, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0462].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions

Let A be a ring and S, T two multiplicative subsets of A such that S⊂TS \subset T. The following properties are equivalent:

(a) The homomorphism iAT,S:S−1A→T−1Ai^{T,S}_A : S^{-1}A \to T^{-1}A is bijective. (b) For every A-module M, the homomorphism iAT,S:S−1M→T−1Mi^{T,S}_A : S^{-1}M \to T^{-1}M is bijective. (c) For all t∈Tt \in T, there exists a∈Aa \in A such that at∈Sat \in S (in other words, every element of T divides an element of S). (d) Every prime ideal which meets T meets S.

It has been seen above that iAT,S=1M⊗iAT,Si^{T,S}_A = 1_M \otimes i^{T,S}_A, which immediately proves the equivalence of (a) and (b). Set T′=iAS(T)T' = i^S_A(T); then (Proposition 7) T−1AT^{-1}A is identified with T′−1(S−1A){T'}^{-1}(S^{-1}A) and (a) is equivalent to saying that the elements of T′T' are invertible in S−1AS^{-1}A (no. 1, Remark 5). Now, to say that (t/1)(a/s)=1/1(t/1)(a/s) = 1/1 (t∈Tt \in T, a∈A,s∈Sa \in A, s \in S) means that there exists s′∈Ss' \in S such that tas′=ss′tas' = ss', which shows the equivalence of (a) and (c). We show that (d) implies (c). Let tt be an element of T and suppose that t/1t/1 is not invertible in S−1AS^{-1}A; then there exists a maximal ideal m′m' of S−1AS^{-1}A containing t/1t/1 (Algebra, Chapter I, § 8, no. 7, Theorem 2) and p=(iAS)−1(m′)p = (i^S_A)^{-1}(m') is a prime ideal of A containing tt and not meeting S (since the image under iASi^S_A of an element of S is invertible). Conversely, if there exists a prime ideal pp which meets T without meeting S, then no element of p∩Tp \cap T can divide an element of S; this proves that (c) implies (d) and completes the proof.

It follows from Proposition 8 that, amongst the multiplicative subsets T of A containing S and satisfying the equivalent conditions of Proposition 8, there exists a greatest, consisting of all the elements of A which divide an element of S (cf. Exercise 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.