Bourbaki

Corollary 5

Tag 046F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 046F].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Rings and modules of fractions

Let AA be a ring, SS a multiplicative subset of AA and BB a ring such that iAS(A)⊂B⊂S−1Ai_A^S(A) \subset B \subset S^{-1}A. Let qq be a prime ideal of BB such that the prime ideal p=(iAS)−1(q)p = (i_A^S)^{-1}(q) of AA does not meet SS and let p′p' be the prime ideal S−1pS^{-1}p of S−1AS^{-1}A. Then p′∩B=qp' \cap B = q.

Let S′=iAS(S)S' = i_A^S(S); a canonical isomorphism has been defined from S′−1B{S'}^{-1}B to S−1AS^{-1}A (no. 1, Corollary 4 to Proposition 2); we identify these two rings by means of this isomorphism. As q∩S′=∅q \cap S' = \varnothing, q′=S′−1qq' = {S'}^{-1}q is the unique prime ideal of S−1A=S′−1BS^{-1}A = {S'}^{-1}B such that q′∩B=(iAS)−1(q′)=qq' \cap B = (i_A^S)^{-1}(q') = q (Proposition 11 (ii)), whence (iAS)−1(q′)=p(i_A^S)^{-1}(q') = p; consequently q′=p′q' = p' (Proposition 11 (ii)).

In the notation of Corollary 5, there are canonical isomorphisms of AA, and BqB_q onto (S−1A)q(S^{-1}A)_q. (Proposition 11 (iii)) and hence a canonical isomorphism A,→BqA, \to B_q.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.