Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 04OF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04OF].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 1. Notion of an integral element

Let A=⨁i∈ZAi\mathbf{A} = \bigoplus_{i \in \mathbf{Z}} \mathbf{A}_i be a graded integral domain and SS the set of homogeneous elements ≠0\neq 0 of A\mathbf{A}.

(i) Every homogeneous element ≠0\neq 0 of S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} is invertible, the ring K0=(S−1A)0K_0 = (S^{-1}\mathbf{A})_0 is a field and the set of i∈Zi \in \mathbf{Z} such that (S−1A)i≠0(S^{-1}\mathbf{A})_i \neq 0 is a subgroup qZq\mathbf{Z} of Z\mathbf{Z} (where q⩾0q \geqslant 0).

(ii) Suppose that q⩾1q \geqslant 1 and let tt be a non-zero element of (S−1A)q(S^{-1}\mathbf{A})_q. Then the K0K_0-homomorphism ff of the polynomial ring K0[X]K_0[X] to S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} which maps XX to tt extends to an isomorphism of K0[X,X−1]K_0[X, X^{-1}] onto S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} and S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} is integrally closed.

The assertions in (i) follow immediately from the definitions and the hypothesis that A\mathbf{A} is an integral domain, for if a/sa/s and a′/s′a'/s' are two homogeneous elements ≠0\neq 0 of S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} of degrees ii and i′i', aa′/ss′aa'/ss' is a homogeneous element ≠0\neq 0 and of degree i+i′i + i'. To show (ii), we note that since tt is invertible in S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} the homomorphism ff extends in a unique way to a homomorphism f~:K0[X,X−1]→S−1A\tilde{f}: K_0[X, X^{-1}] \to S^{-1}\mathbf{A} and necessarily f~(X−1)=t−1\tilde{f}(X^{-1}) = t^{-1}. On the other hand, by definition of qq, every homogeneous element ≠0\neq 0 of S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} is of degree qn (n∈Z)qn \ (n \in \mathbf{Z}) and hence can be written uniquely in the form λtn\lambda t^n where λ∈K0\lambda \in K_0 (since S−1AS^{-1}\mathbf{A} is an integral domain); hence f~\tilde{f} is bijective. Finally, we know that K0[X]K_0[X] is integrally closed (no. 3, Proposition 10) and hence so is K0[X,X−1]K_0[X, X^{-1}] (no. 5, Corollary 1 to Proposition 16), which completes the proof of the Lemma.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.