Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 051Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 051Z].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 3. Factorial domains

Let f∈Bf \in B be a series whose reduced series is non-zero. Let ss denote its reduced order and MM the sub-A-module of BB with basis {1,X,…,Xs−1}\{1, X, \ldots, X^{s-1}\}. Then BB is the direct sum of MM and ff is not a divisor of zero in BB.

(a) We show that f∣B∩M=(0)f \mid B \cap M = (0). Suppose that there is a relation:

(∑i=0∞biXi)f=r0+r1X+⋯+rs−1Xs−1(bi∈A,rj∈A). \left( \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} b_i X^i \right) f = r_0 + r_1 X + \cdots + r_{s-1} X^{s-1} \qquad (b_i \in A, r_j \in A).
We show that the bib_i (and hence the rjr_j) are all zero, which will prove in particular that ff is not a divisor of zero in BB. Since AA is Hausdorff, it suffices to show that bi∈mnb_i \in m^n for all i≥0i \geq 0 and all n≥0n \geq 0. It is obvious for n=0n = 0. We shall argue by double induction: we shall assume that bi∈mn−1b_i \in m^{n-1} for all ii and bi∈mnb_i \in m^n for i<ki < k and show that this implies that bk∈mnb_k \in m^n. For this, we write f=∑i=1∞aiXif = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} a_i X^i and compare the coefficients of Xs+kX^{s+k} in (3); then:
(b0as+k+⋯+bk−1as+1)+bkas+(bk+1as−1+⋯+bk+sa0)=0. (b_0 a_{s+k} + \cdots + b_{k-1} a_{s+1}) + b_k a_s + (b_{k+1} a_{s-1} + \cdots + b_{k+s} a_0) = 0.
The terms in the first bracket belong to mnm^n since the bi∈mnb_i \in m^n for i<ki < k; similarly for those in the second, since the bi∈mn−1b_i \in m^{n-1} for all ii and the ai∈ma_i \in m for i≤s−1i \leq s-1. Hence bkas∈mnb_k a_s \in m^n and, as asa_s is an invertible element of AA, bk∈mnb_k \in m^n.

(b) We show that f∣B+M=Bf \mid B + M = B. We write

g=as+as+1X+as+2X2+⋯ ; g = a_s + a_{s+1} X + a_{s+2} X^2 + \cdots;
it is an invertible element of BB. Then
f−Xsg=a0+a1X+⋯+as−1Xs−1; f - X^s g = a_0 + a_1 X + \cdots + a_{s-1} X^{s-1};
if therefore we write fg−1−Xs=(f−Xsg)g−1=−hfg^{-1} - X^s = (f - X^s g) g^{-1} = -h, the coefficients of hh belong to mm. Then let rr be an element of BB. By induction on nn we define a sequence (q(n))(q^{(n)}) of elements of B: we take q(0)q^{(0)} to be the unique series satisfying:
r≡Xsq(0)(modM); r \equiv X^s q^{(0)} \pmod{M};
writing h=∑i=0mhiXih = \sum_{i=0}^m h_i X^i and q(n)=∑i=0∞qi(n)Xiq^{(n)} = \sum_{i=0}^\infty q_i^{(n)} X^i, the qi(n)q_i^{(n)} are defined by:
qi(n)=∑j=0i+shjqi+s−j(n−1) q_i^{(n)} = \sum_{j=0}^{i+s} h_j q_{i+s-j}^{(n-1)}
It follows immediately from (6) that:
Xsq(n)≡hq(n−1)(modM). X^s q^{(n)} \equiv h q^{(n-1)} \pmod{M}.
As hj∈mh_j \in m for all jj, it also follows from (6), by induction on nn, that qi(n)∈mnq_i^{(n)} \in m^n for all ii and all nn. As A is complete, it follows that the series
q(0)+q(1)+…+q(n)+… q^{(0)} + q^{(1)} + \ldots + q^{(n)} + \ldots
converges to an element qq of B. By (5) and (7),
Xs(q(0)+q(1)+…+q(n))≡r+h(q(0)+…+q(n−1))(modM). X^s(q^{(0)} + q^{(1)} + \ldots + q^{(n)}) \equiv r + h(q^{(0)} + \ldots + q^{(n-1)}) \pmod{M}.
As M is closed, at the limit (8) gives r≡(Xs−h)q(modM)r \equiv (X^s - h)q \pmod{M}, that is
r∈fg−1q+M⊂fB+M. r \in fg^{-1}q + M \subset fB + M.
We may also use the results of Chapter III, § 2 to show the relation B=fB+MB = fB + M (cf. Exercise 12). The method followed here has the advantage of being applicable to convergent series.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.