Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 05JJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05JJ].

Algebra, chapter I, § 10. Inverse and direct limits

There exists on E one and only one magma structure for which the mappings fα:Eα→Ef_\alpha : E_\alpha \to E are homomorphisms. If the magmas EαE_\alpha are associative (resp. commutative), so is E. If the magmas EαE_\alpha and the homomorphism fβαf_{\beta\alpha} are unital, so are the magma E and the homomorphisms fαf_\alpha.

The magmas EαE_\alpha will be written multiplicatively.

Let x,yx, y be in E. There exist α\alpha in I and xα,yαx_\alpha, y_\alpha in EαE_\alpha such that x=fα(xα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha) and y=fα(yα)y = f_\alpha(y_\alpha). If there exists a magma structure on E for which fαf_\alpha is a homomorphism, then x.y=fα(xαyα)x.y = f_\alpha(x_\alpha y_\alpha), whence the uniqueness of this magma structure.

To prove the existence, we must prove that for α,β\alpha, \beta in I, xα,yαx_\alpha, y_\alpha in EαE_\alpha and xβ′,yβ′x'_\beta, y'_\beta in EβE_\beta, the relations

(5)

fα(xα)=fβ(xβ′),fα(yα)=fβ(yβ′) f_\alpha(x_\alpha) = f_\beta(x'_\beta), \qquad f_\alpha(y_\alpha) = f_\beta(y'_\beta)
imply fα(xαyα)=fβ(xβ′yβ′)f_\alpha(x_\alpha y_\alpha) = f_\beta(x'_\beta y'_\beta). For γ≥α\gamma \geq \alpha and γ≥β\gamma \geq \beta, we set xγ=fγα(xα)x_\gamma = f_{\gamma\alpha}(x_\alpha), yγ=fγα(yα),xγ′=fγβ(xβ′),yγ′=fγβ(yβ′)y_\gamma = f_{\gamma \alpha}(y_\alpha), x'_\gamma = f_{\gamma \beta}(x'_\beta), y'_\gamma = f_{\gamma \beta}(y'_\beta). By the definition of direct limit, there exists γ\gamma in II with γ≥α,γ≥β,xγ=xγ′,yγ=yγ′\gamma \geq \alpha, \gamma \geq \beta, x_\gamma = x'_\gamma, y_\gamma = y'_\gamma. Then
fα(xαyα)=fγ(fγα(xαyα))=fγ(xγyγ)=fγ(xγ′yγ′)=fγ(fγβ(xβ′yβ′))=fβ(xβ′yβ′). f_\alpha(x_\alpha y_\alpha) = f_\gamma(f_{\gamma \alpha}(x_\alpha y_\alpha)) = f_\gamma(x_\gamma y_\gamma) = f_\gamma(x'_\gamma y'_\gamma) = f_\gamma(f_{\gamma \beta}(x'_\beta y'_\beta)) \\ = f_\beta(x'_\beta y'_\beta).
Suppose the magmas EαE_\alpha are associative. Let x,y,zx, y, z be in EE. There exist α∈I\alpha \in I and elements xα,yα,zαx_\alpha, y_\alpha, z_\alpha in EαE_\alpha such that
x=fα(xα),y=fα(yα),z=fα(zα). x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha), \quad y = f_\alpha(y_\alpha), \quad z = f_\alpha(z_\alpha).
Then xy=fα(xαyα)xy = f_\alpha(x_\alpha y_\alpha), whence (xy)z=fα((xαyα)zα)(xy)z = f_\alpha((x_\alpha y_\alpha)z_\alpha); similarly
x(yz)=fα(xα(yαzα)), x(yz) = f_\alpha(x_\alpha(y_\alpha z_\alpha)),
whence (xy)z=x(yz)(xy)z = x(yz) for (xαyα)zα=xα(yαzα)(x_\alpha y_\alpha)z_\alpha = x_\alpha(y_\alpha z_\alpha). The case of commutative magmas is treated analogously.

Suppose finally that each magma EαE_\alpha has an identity element eαe_\alpha and that fβα(eα)=eβf_{\beta \alpha}(e_\alpha) = e_\beta for α≤β\alpha \leq \beta. For α,β\alpha, \beta in II, there exists γ\gamma in II with γ≥α\gamma \geq \alpha and γ≥β\gamma \geq \beta, whence

fα(eα)=fγ(fγα(eα))=fγ(eγ)=fγ(fγβ(eβ))=fβ(eβ) f_\alpha(e_\alpha) = f_\gamma(f_{\gamma \alpha}(e_\alpha)) = f_\gamma(e_\gamma) = f_\gamma(f_{\gamma \beta}(e_\beta)) = f_\beta(e_\beta)
and there thus exists an element ee in EE such that fα(eα)=ef_\alpha(e_\alpha) = e for all α∈I\alpha \in I. Let xx be in EE; choose α∈I\alpha \in I and xα∈Eαx_\alpha \in E_\alpha such that x=fα(xα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha). Then
ex=fα(eα)⋅fα(xα)=fα(eα⋅xα)=fα(xα)=x ex = f_\alpha(e_\alpha) \cdot f_\alpha(x_\alpha) = f_\alpha(e_\alpha \cdot x_\alpha) = f_\alpha(x_\alpha) = x
and similarly x⋅e=xx \cdot e = x, hence ee is the identity element of EE.

The magma EE is called the direct limit of the magmas EαE_\alpha.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.