There exists on E one and only one magma structure for which the mappings fα:Eα→E are homomorphisms. If the magmas Eα are associative (resp. commutative), so is E. If the magmas Eα and the homomorphism fβα are unital, so are the magma E and the homomorphisms fα.
The magmas Eα will be written multiplicatively.
Let x,y be in E. There exist α in I and xα,yα in Eα such that x=fα(xα) and y=fα(yα). If there exists a magma structure on E for which fα is a homomorphism, then x.y=fα(xαyα), whence the uniqueness of this magma structure.
To prove the existence, we must prove that for α,β in I, xα,yα in Eα and xβ′,yβ′ in Eβ, the relations
(5)
fα(xα)=fβ(xβ′),fα(yα)=fβ(yβ′) imply
fα(xαyα)=fβ(xβ′yβ′). For
γ≥α and
γ≥β, we set
xγ=fγα(xα),
yγ=fγα(yα),xγ′=fγβ(xβ′),yγ′=fγβ(yβ′). By the definition of direct limit, there exists
γ in
I with
γ≥α,γ≥β,xγ=xγ′,yγ=yγ′. Then
fα(xαyα)=fγ(fγα(xαyα))=fγ(xγyγ)=fγ(xγ′yγ′)=fγ(fγβ(xβ′yβ′))=fβ(xβ′yβ′). Suppose the magmas
Eα are associative. Let
x,y,z be in
E. There exist
α∈I and elements
xα,yα,zα in
Eα such that
x=fα(xα),y=fα(yα),z=fα(zα). Then
xy=fα(xαyα), whence
(xy)z=fα((xαyα)zα); similarly
x(yz)=fα(xα(yαzα)), whence
(xy)z=x(yz) for
(xαyα)zα=xα(yαzα). The case of commutative magmas is treated analogously.
Suppose finally that each magma Eα has an identity element eα and that fβα(eα)=eβ for α≤β. For α,β in I, there exists γ in I with γ≥α and γ≥β, whence
fα(eα)=fγ(fγα(eα))=fγ(eγ)=fγ(fγβ(eβ))=fβ(eβ) and there thus exists an element
e in
E such that
fα(eα)=e for all
α∈I. Let
x be in
E; choose
α∈I and
xα∈Eα such that
x=fα(xα). Then
ex=fα(eα)⋅fα(xα)=fα(eα⋅xα)=fα(xα)=x and similarly
x⋅e=x, hence
e is the identity element of
E.
The magma E is called the direct limit of the magmas Eα.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.