Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 05JL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05JL].

Algebra, chapter I, § 10. Inverse and direct limits

(a) If the AαA_\alpha are non-zero, A is non-zero. (b) If the AαA_\alpha are integral domains, A is an integral domain. (c) If the AαA_\alpha are fields, A is a field.

Let 0α,1α0_\alpha, 1_\alpha be the zero and unit of AαA_\alpha and 0, 1 the zero and unit of A. There exists α∈I\alpha \in I such that fα(0α)=0,fα(1α)=1f_\alpha(0_\alpha) = 0, f_\alpha(1_\alpha) = 1. If 0=10 = 1, there exists β≥α\beta \geq \alpha such that fβα(0α)=fβα(1α)f_{\beta\alpha}(0_\alpha) = f_{\beta\alpha}(1_\alpha), that is 0β=1β0_\beta = 1_\beta. This proves (a).

Suppose that AαA_\alpha are integral domains. Then A is commutative and non-zero by (a). Let x,yx, y be elements of A such that xy=0xy = 0. There exists α∈I\alpha \in I and xα,yα∈Aαx_\alpha, y_\alpha \in A_\alpha such that x=fα(xα),y=fα(yα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha), y = f_\alpha(y_\alpha). Then fα(xαyα)=xy=0=fα(0α)f_\alpha(x_\alpha y_\alpha) = xy = 0 = f_\alpha(0_\alpha). Hence there exists β≥α\beta \geq \alpha such that fβα(xαyα)=fβα(0α)f_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha y_\alpha) = f_{\beta\alpha}(0_\alpha). As AβA_\beta is an integral domain, it follows that fβα(xα)=0βf_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha) = 0_\beta or fβα(yα)=0βf_{\beta\alpha}(y_\alpha) = 0_\beta, hence x=0x = 0 or y=0y = 0. This proves (b).

Suppose that the AαA_\alpha are fields. Then A≠{0}A \neq \{0\} by (a). Let xx be a non-zero element of A. There exist α∈I\alpha \in I and xα∈Aαx_\alpha \in A_\alpha such that x=fα(xα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha). Then xα≠0x_\alpha \neq 0 and fα(xα−1)f_\alpha(x_\alpha^{-1}) is the inverse of xx in A. This proves (c).

Let E=(Eα,fβα)\mathfrak{E} = (E_\alpha, f_{\beta\alpha}) and E′=(Eα′,fβα′)\mathfrak{E}' = (E'_\alpha, f'_{\beta\alpha}) be two direct systems of magmas (resp. monoids, groups, rings). A homomorphism of E\mathfrak{E} into E′\mathfrak{E}' is a direct system (uα)α∈I(u_\alpha)_{\alpha \in I} of mappings uα:Eα→Eα′u_\alpha : E_\alpha \to E'_\alpha such that each uαu_\alpha is a homomorphism. Under these conditions, the mapping u=lim⁡uαu = \lim u_\alpha from E=lim⁡EαE = \lim E_\alpha to E′=lim⁡Eα′E' = \lim E'_\alpha is a homomorphism (cf. Set Theory, III, § 7, no. 6).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.