Bourbaki

Corollary 2

Tag 05KC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05KC].

Algebra, chapter II, § 1. Modules

Let (Ei)i∈I,(Ei′)i∈I,(Fλ)λ∈L,(Fλ′)λ∈L(E_i)_{i \in I}, (E'_i)_{i \in I}, (F_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L}, (F'_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} be four families of AA-modules and, for each i∈Ii \in I (resp. each λ∈L\lambda \in L), ui:Ei′→Eiu_i : E'_i \to E_i (resp. vλ:Fλ→Fλ′v_\lambda : F_\lambda \to F'_\lambda) a linear mapping. Then the diagram

Hom⁡(⨁i∈IEi′,∏λ∈LFλ′)→ϕ′∏(i,λ)∈I×LHom⁡(Ei′,Fλ′)↑↑Hom⁡(⨁iui,∏λvλ)∏Hom⁡(ui,vλ)Hom⁡(⨁i∈IEi,∏λ∈LFλ)→ϕ∏(i,λ)∈I×LHom⁡(Ei,Fλ) \begin{array}{ccc} \operatorname{Hom}\left( \bigoplus_{i \in I} E'_i, \prod_{\lambda \in L} F'_\lambda \right) & \xrightarrow{\phi'} & \prod_{(i, \lambda) \in I \times L} \operatorname{Hom}(E'_i, F'_\lambda) \\ \uparrow & & \uparrow \\ \operatorname{Hom}\left( \bigoplus_i u_i, \prod_\lambda v_\lambda \right) & & \prod \operatorname{Hom}(u_i, v_\lambda) \\ \operatorname{Hom}\left( \bigoplus_{i \in I} E_i, \prod_{\lambda \in L} F_\lambda \right) & \xrightarrow{\phi} & \prod_{(i, \lambda) \in I \times L} \operatorname{Hom}(E_i, F_\lambda) \end{array}

(where ϕ\phi and ϕ′\phi' are the canonical isomorphisms defined in Corollary 1 to Proposition 6) is commutative.

The verification follows immediately from the definitions.

When all the EiE_i are equal to the same AA-module EE, the direct sum ⨁i∈IEi\bigoplus_{i \in I} E_i is also denoted by E(I)E^{(I)}: its elements are the mappings of II into EE with finite support. If, for all ii, fif_i is taken to be the identity mapping E→EE \to E, by Proposition 6, a linear mapping E(I)→EE^{(I)} \to E is obtained, called codiagonal, which associates with every family (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i \in I} of elements of EE, of finite support, its sum ∑i∈Ixi\sum_{i \in I} x_i.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.