Corollary
Tag 05NN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05NN].
Algebra, chapter II, § 2. Modules of linear mappings. Duality
*Let M, N be two supplementary submodules in an A-module E and the corresponding projectors; then is an isomorphism and (resp. ) is an isomorphism of (resp. ) onto the submodule of orthogonal to (resp. ). Moreover, if and are the canonical injections, and are the projectors , corresponding to the decomposition of as the direct sum of and .
, whence, by transposition (no. 5, formulae (16), (17) and (18)), and the proposition follows from § 1, no. 6, Corollary 2 to Proposition 6.
Under the hypotheses of the Corollary, (resp. ) is often identified with the orthogonal (resp. ) of (resp. ) in , thus identifying every linear form on (resp. ) with the linear form on extending and which is zero on (resp. ).
When an A-module admits a basis , it has been seen that giving this basis defines canonically an isomorphism . By virtue of Proposition 10 and no. 3, Proposition 5, the dual of is canonically identified with the product ; consider the contragredient isomorphism . If, for all is the element of all of whose projections are zero with the exception of that of index , which is equal to 1, and if we write , the elements of are, by (19) and (22), characterized by the relations
(23)
It amounts to the same to say that, for all ; also is called the coordinate form of index on . It follows from (23) that is a free system in .
In particular, if is finite, the form a basis of , the then forming the canonical basis of . Hence:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.