Let A,B be two rings and M=(mik)(i,k)∈I×K and
M′=(mik′)(i,k)∈I×K two matrices with finite indexing sets over an (A,B)*-bimodule*
G.
Suppose that for every matrix unit L=(ai)i∈I with one row and elements in A and every matrix unit C=(bk)k∈K with one column and elements in B,
L.M.C=L.M′.C (
the products being calculated via the external laws of the (A,B)*-module*
G); then*
M=M′.
If L is taken to be the matrix unit (as) with ai=1,as=0 for s=i, and C the matrix unit (bt) with bk=1,bt=0 for t=k, the products L.M.C and L.M′.C are matrices with a single element respectively equal to mik and mik′.
Let A,B be two rings and σ:A→B a homomorphism.
For every matrix M=(mik) over A, we shall denote by σ(M) the matrix (σ(mik)) over B; clearly σ(aM)=σ(a)σ(M), σ(Ma)=σ(M)σ(a) for a∈A, also σ(tM)=(t(σ(M))) and
{σ(M+M′)=σ(M)+σ(M′)σ(MM′)=σ(M)σ(M′) when the operations considered are defined, the products on the left and right hand sides of (12) being calculated in A and B respectively. When
σ is denoted by
x↦xσ, we write
Mσ instead of
σ(M).
Consider in particular an anti-endomorphism σ of A, that is a homomorphism of A to the opposite ring A0, or a mapping of A into itself such that
σ(a+a′)=σ(a)+σ(a′),σ(aa′)=σ(a′)σ(a) for all a,a′ in A; then, for two matrices
M,M′ over
A whose product
MM′ is defined,
σ(MM′)=(t(σ(tM′)).σ(tM)) where the products on the two sides are calculated in A;
this follows immediately from (10) and (12).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.