Bourbaki

Proposition 15

Tag 068I, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 068I].

Algebra, chapter III, § 11. Cogebras, products of multilinear forms, inner products and duality

Let E be a vector space of dimension n and let e be an element ≠0\neq 0 of ∧n(E)\wedge^n(E) (hence forming a basis of this vector space). Let ϕ:∧(E)→∧(E∗)\phi : \wedge(E) \to \wedge(E^*) be the vector space isomorphism associated with e (no. 11, Proposition 12). If z is a pure element of ∧p(E)\wedge^p(E), then ϕ(z)\phi(z) is a pure element of ∧n−p(E∗)\wedge^{n-p}(E^*) and the subspaces associated with z and ϕ(z)\phi(z) are orthogonal.

The cases p=0p = 0 and p=np = n are trivial. Suppose therefore that 1≤p≤n−11 \leq p \leq n - 1 and let z=x1∧⋯∧xp≠0z = x_1 \wedge \cdots \wedge x_p \neq 0. Then there exists a basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of E such that ei=xie_i = x_i for 1≤i≤p1 \leq i \leq p and e=e1∧e2∧⋯∧ene = e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n. It then follows from formula (78) of no. 11 that ϕ(z)=±ep+1∗∧⋯∧en∗\phi(z) = \pm e_{p+1}^* \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n^*, whence the proposition.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.