Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 06AP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06AP].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 2. Zeros of polynomials

— Let f∈A[X]f \in \mathbf{A}[X], a∈Aa \in \mathbf{A}, and let hh be an integer ≥0\geq 0. The following conditions are equivalent: (i) ff is divisible by (X−α)h(X - \alpha)^h but not by (X−α)h−1(X - \alpha)^{h-1}; (ii) *there exists g∈A[X]g \in \mathbf{A}[X] such that f=(X−α)hgf = (X - \alpha)^h g and g(a)≠0g(a) \neq 0. (i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) follows at once from Prop. 1. (ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) : Suppose that f=(X−α)hgf = (X - \alpha)^h g, where gg does not admit aa as a root. Then ff is divisible by (X−α)h(X - \alpha)^h; if g1∈A[X]g_1 \in \mathbf{A}[X] existed such that f=(X−α)h+1g1f = (X - \alpha)^{h+1} g_1, then since (X−α)n(X - \alpha)^n is not a divisor of zero in A[X]\mathbf{A}[X] (IV, p. 9, Prop. 7), we have g=(X−a) g1g = (X - a)\ g_1 and so g(α)=0g(\alpha) = 0, which is absurd.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.