— Assume that A is an integral domain. Let I be a set, (Hi)i∈I a family of infinite subsets of A and H=∏i∈IHi⊂A′. Iff is a non-zero element of A[(Xi)i∈I], and Hf the set of all x∈H such that f(x)=0, then H and Hf are equipotent.
a) First suppose that I is finite and put n=Card I. The proposition is clear for n=0; we shall prove it by induction on n. Choose an element i0 of I and put J=I−{i0}, B=A[(Xi)i∈J]. Since f=0, we can write f=∑k=0mgkXi0k, where g0,…,gm∈B and gm=0. By the induction hypothesis the set K of all x∈∏i∈sHi such that gm(x)=0 is equipotent with ∏i∈JHi. For x∈K the polynomial
h(Xi0)=k=0∑mgk(x)Xi0k∈A[Xi0] is non-zero. By Th. 1 (IV, p. 16) the set of
a∈Hi0 such that
h(α)=0 is equipotent with
Hi0 whence
CardH≥CardHf≥(CardK)⋅(CardHi0)=CardH, and so
CardH=CardHf.
b) In the general case there is a finite subset I′ of I such that f∈A[(Xi)i∈I′]. Let Hf′ be the set of all x∈∏i∈I′Hi such that f(x)=0. Then
Hf=Hf′×(i∈I−I′∏Hi), and it suffices to apply the first part of the proof to
Hf′.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.