Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 073S, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 073S].

Algebra, VII, p. 17, § 4. Finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain

*Let LL be a free module over a principal ideal domain AA and let MM be a nonzero submodule of LL. Let xx be an element of MM such that cL(x)c_L(x) is maximal among the contents of elements of MM, let cc be a content of xx in LL, and let ff be a linear form on LL such that f(x)=cf(x) = c.

a) LL is the direct sum of A(x/c)A(x/c) and the kernel KK of ff. b) MM is the direct sum of AxAx and K∩MK \cap M. c) g(M)⊂Acg(M) \subset Ac for every linear form gg on LL.

Put y=x/cy = x/c ; clearly Ay∩K={0}Ay \cap K = \{0\}, since f(y)=1f(y) = 1. Furthermore, for each u∈Lu \in L we have

u=f(u) y+(u−f(u) y), u = f(u)\,y + (u - f(u)\,y),
with f(u)y∈Ayf(u)y \in Ay and u−f(u)y∈Ku - f(u)y \in K ; this proves a). Now note that for u∈Mu \in M we have f(u)∈Acf(u) \in Ac : indeed, let u∈Mu \in M, and let dd be a gcd of f(u)f(u) and cc ; then there exist λ,μ∈A\lambda, \mu \in A such that d=Xf(u)+μc=f(Xu+μx)d = Xf(u) + \mu c = f(Xu + \mu x) ; hence the content of the element λu+μx\lambda u + \mu x of MM divides dd ; by the maximality of cc, this implies that dd is an associate of cc, so f(u)∈Acf(u) \in Ac. Hence for all uu in MM, we can write
u=(f(u)/c) x+(u−(f(u)/c) x)∈Ax+(K∩M), u = (f(u)/c)\,x + (u - (f(u)/c)\,x) \in Ax + (K \cap M),
which shows b). Finally, let gg be a linear form on LL ; by a) there exists a scalar α∈A\alpha \in A and a linear form hh on KK such that g(u)=αf(u)+h(u−f(u) y)g(u) = \alpha f(u) + h(u - f(u)\,y) ; thus by

b) we have g(M)⊂Ac+h(K∩M)g(M) \subset Ac + h(K \cap M). To prove c), it is therefore sufficient to prove that h(K∩M)⊂Ach(K \cap M) \subset Ac for every linear form hh on KK, or equivalently for every linear form hh on LL such that h(x)=0h(x) = 0; now, if u∈K∩Mu \in K \cap M and dd is a gcd of h(u)h(u) and cc, then there exist A,μ∈AA, \mu \in A with d=λh(u)+μcd = \lambda h(u) + \mu c; then (f+h)(Au+μx)=d(f + h)(Au + \mu x) = d, which implies as above that h(u)∈Ach(u) \in Ac, and c) follows.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.