Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 076L, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 076L].

Algebra, chapter VII, § 5. Endomorphisms of vector spaces

Let g and h be two commuting endomorphisms of a vector space E. Then each eigenspace of g is closed under h.

Indeed, if WλW_\lambda is the eigenspace of g corresponding to the eigenvalue λ\lambda, then for all x∈Wx \in W, we have

gh⋅x=hg⋅x=h⋅λx=λh⋅x, gh \cdot x = hg \cdot x = h \cdot \lambda x = \lambda h \cdot x ,
which says that h⋅x∈Wλh \cdot x \in W_\lambda.

Let us now return to the proof of Prop. 13. Among all decompositions of E as a direct sum of nonzero subspaces each closed under all the elements of S\mathscr{S}, choose one with the greatest number of components (the dimension of E is an upper bound for this number), say E=∑i∈IEiE = \sum_{i \in I} E_i. Let u∈Su \in \mathscr{S} and let E=∑VαE = \sum V_\alpha be the decomposition of E as the direct sum of the eigenspaces of uu. By Lemma 3, each VαV_\alpha is closed under S\mathscr{S}, and hence so is each Vi∩EiV_i \cap E_i; by Prop. 12 each EiE_i is the direct sum of the Vi∩EiV_i \cap E_i. The choice of the EiE_i thus forces each EiE_i to be contained in one of the VαV_\alpha; thus the restriction of uu to each EiE_i is a homothety. Since this is true for all the elements of S\mathscr{S}, it follows that S\mathscr{S} is diagonalisable.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.