Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 07G0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 07G0].

Topological Vector Spaces, II, p. 39, § 5. Separation of convex sets

Let XX be a closed convex set in a locally convex space EE. Then every lower semi-continuous convex function ff defined in XX is the upper envelope of a family of functions that are the restrictions to XX of continuous affine linear functions in EE.

For, the set A⊂E×RA \subset E \times \mathbf{R} of points (x,t)(x, t) such that x∈Xx \in X and t⩾f(x)t \geqslant f(x) is convex (II, p. 17, prop. 19) and closed, since the function (x,t)↦f(x)−t(x, t) \mapsto f(x) - t is lower semi-continuous. Then let xx be any point of XX and let a∈Ra \in \mathbf{R} be such that a<f(x)a < f(x). By cor. 1 of II, p. 38, there exists a closed hyperplane HH in E×RE \times \mathbf{R}, that contains (x,a)(x, a) and does not meet AA. Every linear continuous form on E×RE \times \mathbf{R} being of the form

(z,t)→u(z)+λt, (z, t) \to u(z) + \lambda t ,

where λ∈R\lambda \in \mathbf{R} and uu is a continuous linear form on EE, it follows that HH has an equation of the form u(z)+λt=αu(z) + \lambda t = \alpha, and as HH contains (x,a)(x, a) we have α=u(x)+λa\alpha = u(x) + \lambda a. Now the point (x,f(x))∈A(x, f(x)) \in A does not belong to HH and therefore λ≠0\lambda \neq 0. Dividing by −λ-\lambda, if necessary, we can write the equation of HH as t−a=u(z−x)t - a = u(z - x). As f(x)−a>0f(x) - a > 0, we have, therefore, f(z)>u(z−x)+af(z) > u(z - x) + a for all z∈Xz \in X and this proves the proposition.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.