1— Let X and Y be two locally compact spaces, K (resp. L) a compact subset of X (resp. Y).
(i) The restriction to K(X×Y,K×L;C) of the canonical bijection
ω:F(X×Y;C)→F(X;F(Y;C))
(S, R, §4, No. 14) is an isometry of the Banach space K(X×Y,K×L;C) onto the Banach space K(X,K;K(Y,L;C)).
(ii) The vector space K(X,K;C)⊗CK(Y,L;C), identified canonically with a subspace of K(X×Y,K×L;C) (A, II, §7, No. 7, comments following the Cor. of Prop. 15), is dense in this Banach space.
It is immediate that the image under ω of K(X×Y,K×L;C) is contained in K(X,K;K(Y,L;C)). Conversely, if u is a continuous mapping of X into K(Y,L;C), with support contained in K, then the mapping (x,y)↦u(x)(y) of X×Y into C is continuous and has support contained in K×L, therefore the restriction of ω to K(X×Y,K×L;C) is a bijection of this space onto K(X,K;K(Y,L;C)); the fact that this restriction is a Banach space isometry follows from the relation
(x,y)∈K×Lsup∣f(x,y)∣=x∈Ksup(y∈Lsup∣f(x,y)∣).
This proves (i); on the other hand the image under ω, of
K(X,K;C)⊗CK(Y,L;C)
identified with a subspace of K(X×Y,K×L;C), is again the space K(X,K;C)⊗CK(Y,L;C) but this time identified canonically with a space of mappings of X into K(Y,L;C) (A, II, §7, No. 7, Cor. of Prop. 15); but this subspace of K(X,K;K(Y,L;C)) is known to be dense in the latter space (§ 1, No. 2, Prop. 5), thus the conclusion of (ii) follows from the fact that the restriction of ω is a topological isomorphism.
Having proved the lemma, we now observe that every compact subset of X×Y is contained in a product K×L, where K (resp. L) is a compact subset of X (resp. Y). It therefore follows from Lemma 1, (ii) that the subspace K(X;C)⊗CK(Y;C) is dense in K(X×Y;C); since the relation (1) may also be written as ν(g⊗h)=λ(g)μ(h) for g∈K(X;C), h∈K(Y;C), the uniqueness of ν follows at once. To prove the existence of ν, we shall make use of the following lemma:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.