— Let X be a discrete space, μ a positive measure on X, and set α(x)=μ(φ{x}) for all x∈X. Every numerical function f defined on X is then continuous; for such a function f≥0, μ∗(f)=∑x∈Xα(x)f(x), where we agree to set α(x)f(x)=0 whenever α(x)=0 and f(x)=+∞. For,
x∈X∑α(x)f(x)=Msup(x∈M∑α(x)f(x)), where
M runs over the set of all finite subsets of
X. If there exists an
x0∈X such that
f(x0)=+∞ and
α(x0)>0, then
∑x∈Mα(x)f(x)=+∞ whenever
x0∈M, and, on the other hand,
f≥n⋅φ{x0} for every integer
n>0, therefore
μ∗(f)≥nα(x0) and so
μ∗(f)=+∞. If, on the contrary,
α(x)=0 at all the points where
f(x)=+∞, then the function
g equal to
f at the points
x∈M where
α(x)>0 and to 0 elsewhere belongs to
H+, and so, by virtue of the conventions made,
μ(g)=∑x∈Mα(x)f(x), which again proves the relation
μ∗(f)=∑x∈Xα(x)f(x).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.