Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 08Z6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08Z6].

Integration, chapter IV, § 7. Barycenters

Let X be a compact space, H\mathscr{H} a closed linear subspace of the Banach space C(X;C)\mathscr{C}(X; \mathbf{C}) (resp. C(X;R)\mathscr{C}(X; \mathbf{R})). Let a be a point of X admitting a countable fundamental system of neighborhoods; assume that, for any numbers c and d such that 0<c<d<10 < c < d < 1 and any open neighborhood U of a, there exists an f∈Hf \in \mathscr{H} such that

∣f∣≤1,∣f(a)∣≥d,∣f(x)∣≤c for all x∈X−U. |f| \leq 1,\quad |f(a)| \geq d,\quad |f(x)| \leq c \text{ for all } x \in X - U.
Then there exists a function u∈Hu \in \mathscr{H} such that ∣u(x)∣<∣u(a)∣|u(x)| < |u(a)| for all x≠ax \neq a.

Let (Vn)(V_n) (n≥1n \geq 1) be a fundamental system of neighborhoods of aa, and let λ,μ,ε\lambda, \mu, \varepsilon be numbers such that

0<λ<1,1<μ<μ+ε≤1+λ. 0 < \lambda < 1,\quad 1 < \mu < \mu + \varepsilon \leq 1 + \lambda.
Thus 0<λ/μ<1/μ<10 < \lambda / \mu < 1 / \mu < 1. We are going to define, by induction on nn (n≥1n \geq 1), a decreasing sequence (Un)(U_n) of open neighborhoods of aa such that Un⊂VnU_n \subset V_n for all nn, and a sequence (hn)(h_n) of functions in H\mathscr{H} satisfying the relations
(13n)∣hn(x)∣≤μfor all x∈X(14n)hn(a)=1(15n)∣hn(x)∣≤λfor all x∈X−Un(16n)∣∑j=1nλjhj(y)∣<∑j=1n+1λjfor all y∈X. \begin{align*} (13_n) &\quad |h_n(x)| \leq \mu \quad \text{for all } x \in X \\ (14_n) &\quad h_n(a) = 1 \\ (15_n) &\quad |h_n(x)| \leq \lambda \quad \text{for all } x \in X - U_n \\ (16_n) &\quad \left| \sum_{j=1}^n \lambda^j h_j(y) \right| < \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \lambda^j \quad \text{for all } y \in X. \end{align*}
Assume hmh_m and UmU_m defined for 1≤m<n1 \leq m < n, satisfying the four preceding conditions (with nn replaced by mm); on the other hand, set U0=XU_0 = X. The function ∑j=1n−1λjhj\sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \lambda^j h_j (equal to 0 if n=1n = 1) is continuous and takes the value ∑j=1n−1λj\sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \lambda^j at the point aa; therefore there exists an open neighborhood UnU_n of aa, contained in Un−1∩VnU_{n-1} \cap V_n, such that
∣∑j=1n−1λjhj(y)∣<∑j=1n−1λj+ελnfor all y∈Un. \left| \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \lambda^j h_j(y) \right| < \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \lambda^j + \varepsilon \lambda^n \quad \text{for all } y \in U_n.
By hypothesis there exists a function f∈Hf \in \mathscr{H} such that
∣f(x)∣≤1for all x∈X,∣f(a)∣≥1/μ,∣f(x)∣≤λ/μfor x∈X−Un. \begin{align*} |f(x)| &\leq 1 \quad \text{for all } x \in X , \quad |f(a)| \geq 1 / \mu , \\ |f(x)| &\leq \lambda / \mu \quad \text{for } x \in X - U_n . \end{align*}
Set hn=f/f(a)h_n = f / f(a); the relations (13n)(13_n), (14n)(14_n) and (15n)(15_n) then hold; set
g=∑j=1nλjhj=∑j=1n−1λjhj+λnhn. g = \sum_{j=1}^n \lambda^j h_j = \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \lambda^j h_j + \lambda^n h_n .
By (17) and (13n)(13_n), for y∈Uny \in U_n we have
∣g(y)∣<∑j=1n−1λj+ελn+μλn≤∑j=1n+1λj, |g(y)| < \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \lambda^j + \varepsilon \lambda^n + \mu \lambda^n \leq \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \lambda^j ,

since ε+μ≤1+λ\varepsilon + \mu \leq 1 + \lambda; for x∈X−Unx \in X - U_n, we have ∣hp(x)∣≤λ|h_p(x)| \leq \lambda for 1≤p≤n1 \leq p \leq n, whence also

∣g(x)∣≤∑j=2n+1λj<∑j=1n+1λj, |g(x)| \leq \sum_{j=2}^{n+1} \lambda^j < \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \lambda^j,
which completes the proof of (16n)(16_n).

This being so, the series ∑n=1∞λnhn\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lambda^n h_n is normally convergent in XX since λ<1\lambda < 1 and ∣hn(x)∣≤μ|h_n(x)| \leq \mu for all nn and all x∈Xx \in X; let uu be its sum, which belongs to H\mathscr{H} since H\mathscr{H} is closed. By the relation (14n)(14_n), we have u(a)=∑n=1∞λnu(a) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lambda^n; on the other hand if x≠ax \neq a, there exists an integer nn such that x∉Un+1x \notin U_{n+1}; therefore ∣hn+k(x)∣≤λ|h_{n+k}(x)| \leq \lambda for all k≥1k \geq 1 by the relation (15n)(15_n); it follows, using (16n)(16_n), that

∣u(x)∣≤∣∑j=1nλjhj(x)∣+∣∑j=n+1∞λjhj(x)∣<∑j=1n+1λj+λ∑j=n+1∞λj |u(x)| \leq \left| \sum_{j=1}^n \lambda^j h_j(x) \right| + \left| \sum_{j=n+1}^{\infty} \lambda^j h_j(x) \right| < \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \lambda^j + \lambda \sum_{j=n+1}^{\infty} \lambda^j
=∑j=1∞λj=∣u(a)∣. = \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} \lambda^j = |u(a)|.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.