Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0996, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0996].

Integration, chapter VI, § 1. Integration of vector-valued functions

Let G,HG, H be two locally convex spaces, UU a mapping of a locally compact space TT into L(G;H)\mathscr{L}(G; H). The following conditions are equivalent: a) The mapping (t,x)↦U(t)⋅x(t, x) \mapsto U(t) \cdot x of T×GT \times G into HH is continuous. b) For every compact subset KK of TT, U(K)U(K) is equicontinuous, and there exists a total set D⊂GD \subset G such that for every x∈Dx \in D, the mapping t↦U(t)⋅xt \mapsto U(t) \cdot x is continuous on TT.

Moreover, when UU satisfies these conditions, UU is a continuous mapping of TT into L(G;H)\mathscr{L}(G; H) equipped with the topology of compact convergence.

To see that a) implies b), we observe that for every neighborhood VV of 0 in HH and every t∈Kt \in K, there exist by hypothesis a neighborhood LtL_t of tt in TT and a neighborhood WtW_t of 0 in GG such that the relations t′∈Ltt' \in L_t and x∈Wtx \in W_t imply U(t′)⋅x∈VU(t') \cdot x \in V. It suffices to cover KK with a finite number of neighborhoods LtiL_{t_i} and to take W=⋂iWtiW = \bigcap_i W_{t_i} in order to have U(t)⋅x∈VU(t) \cdot x \in V whenever t∈Kt \in K and x∈Wx \in W, which proves the equicontinuity of U(K)U(K).

Conversely, suppose b) is verified; it suffices to show that for every compact subset KK of TT, the mapping (t,x)↦U(t)⋅x(t, x) \mapsto U(t) \cdot x is continuous on K×GK \times G. Let M=U(K)M = U(K); since MM is equicontinuous, it follows that on MM, the topology of pointwise convergence in GG is identical to the topology of pointwise convergence in DD (GT, X, §2, No. 4, Th. 1); the hypothesis b) therefore implies that t↦U(t)t \mapsto U(t) is a continuous mapping of KK into L(G;H)\mathscr{L}(G; H) when L(G;H)\mathscr{L}(G; H) is equipped with the topology of pointwise convergence. On the other hand, (A,x)↦A⋅x(A, x) \mapsto A \cdot x is a continuous mapping of M×GM \times G into HH when MM is equipped with the topology of pointwise convergence (GT, X, §2, No. 1, Cor. 4 of Prop. 1). Since the mapping (t,x)↦U(t)⋅x(t, x) \mapsto U(t) \cdot x may be factored as (t,x)↦(U(t),x)↦U(t)⋅x(t, x) \mapsto (U(t), x) \mapsto U(t) \cdot x, we conclude that it is continuous.

Finally, the last assertion of the lemma follows from the fact that, on MM, the topology of compact convergence is identical to that of pointwise convergence (GT, X, §2, No. 4, Th. 1).

Thus, suppose that UU satisfies the conditions of Lemma 3; then (if HH is quasi-complete) one defines, as in No. 6, a linear mapping λ↦∫Udλ\lambda \mapsto \int U d\lambda of C′(T)\mathscr{C}'(T) into F=L(G;H)F = \mathscr{L}(G; H). We set U(λ)=∫UdλU(\lambda) = \int U d\lambda.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • X, §2, No. 1, Cor. 4 not yet on this site
  • X, §2, No. 4, Th. 1 not yet on this site
  • Prop. 1
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.