Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 09N0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09N0].

Integration, chapter IX, § 1. Premeasures and measures on a topological space

*Let TT be a locally compact space, and let μ\mu be a measure on TT. Denote by W(μ)W(\mu) the mapping that associates to each compact subset KK of TT the induced measure μK\mu_K. Then W(μ)W(\mu) is a premeasure on TT, one has W(∣μ∣)=∣W(μ)∣W(|\mu|) = |W(\mu)|, and the linear mapping W:μ↦W(μ)W : \mu \mapsto W(\mu) is a bijection of the space M(T;C)\mathscr{M}(T; \mathbf{C}) onto the space P(T;C)\mathscr{P}(T; \mathbf{C}) of premeasures on TT. Moreover, if μ\mu is positive then μ∗=(W(μ))∗\mu^* = (W(\mu))^*.

It is clear that W(μ)W(\mu) is a premeasure (Ch. V, §7, No. 2, Prop. 4) and that the mapping WW is linear. The relation W(μ)=0W(\mu) = 0 means that μ\mu induces the measure 0 on every compact set in TT; then μ(f)=0\mu(f) = 0 for f∈H(T;C)f \in \mathscr{H}(T; \mathbf{C}), thus μ=0\mu = 0, which proves that WW is injective. It remains to prove that WW is surjective. Since every premeasure is a linear combination of positive premeasures, it will suffice to construct, for every positive premeasure ww, a positive measure μ\mu such that w=W(μ)w = W(\mu). Let f∈H(T)f \in \mathscr{H}(T) be a given function, and let LL be a compact set containing the support of ff; the number wL(fL)w_L(f_L) is independent of the choice of LL, by the definition of induced measures, so that one can set μ(f)=wL(fL)\mu(f) = w_L(f_L); then μ\mu is a positive linear form on H(T)\mathscr{H}(T), that is, a positive measure. Let us verify that w=W(μ)w = W(\mu); first, the relation μ∙(f)=wL∙(fL)\mu^\bullet(f) = w_L^\bullet(f_L) extends to the case that ff is a finite upper semi-continuous function that is positive and is zero outside LL. For, let MM be a compact neighborhood of LL, and H\mathscr{H} the (decreasing directed) set of continuous functions on TT, with support contained in MM, that are ≥f\geq f. Then (Ch. IV, §4, No. 4, Cor. 2 of Prop. 5)

μ∙(f)=inf⁡h∈Hμ(h)=inf⁡h∈HwM(hM)=wM∙(fM), \mu^\bullet(f) = \inf_{h \in \mathscr{H}} \mu(h) = \inf_{h \in \mathscr{H}} w_M(h_M) = w_M^\bullet(f_M),

and on the other hand wM∙(fM)=wL∙(fL)w_M^\bullet(f_M) = w_L^\bullet(f_L) since fMf_M is zero on M−LM - L (Ch. V, §7, No. 1, Prop. 1). In particular, if ff is taken to be the extension by 0 of an element of H+(L)\mathscr{H}_+(L), this formula shows that μL=wL\mu_L = w_L by the definition of induced measures, thus indeed W(μ)=wW(\mu) = w.

If μ\mu is positive, then

μ∙(f)=sup⁡Kμ∙(fφK)=sup⁡KμK∙(fK)=(W(μ))∙(f) \mu^\bullet(f) = \sup_K \mu^\bullet(f \varphi_K) = \sup_K \mu_K^\bullet(f_K) = (W(\mu))^\bullet(f)

for every f∈F+(T)f \in \mathscr{F}_+(T) (Ch. V, §1, Def. 1 and §7, Prop. 1). The relation ∣W(μ)∣=W(∣μ∣)|W(\mu)| = W(|\mu|) is obvious (Ch. IV, §5, No. 7, Lemma 3).

Q.E.D.

When TT is locally compact, we shall from now on identify the spaces M(T;C)\mathscr{M}(T; \mathbf{C}) and P(T;C)\mathscr{P}(T; \mathbf{C}) by means of the bijection WW.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.