Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 08ZO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 08ZO].

Integration, V, p. 2, § 1. Essential upper integral

For every function f∈F+(T)f \in \mathscr{F}_+(T) one calls essential upper integral of ff with respect to μ\mu, and denotes by μ∙(f)\mu^\bullet(f), the supremum, finite or not, of the set of numbers μ∗(fφK)\mu^*(f \varphi_K), where KK runs over the set of compact subsets of TT. For every subset AA of TT, one sets μ∙(A)=μ∙(φA)\mu^\bullet(A) = \mu^\bullet(\varphi_A).

The notations ∫∙fdμ\int^\bullet f d\mu, ∫∙f(t)dμ(t)\int^\bullet f(t) d\mu(t), ∫∙fμ\int^\bullet f \mu are also used. Since fφK≤ff \varphi_K \leq f for every compact subset KK of TT, one has

∫∙fdμ≤∫∗fdμ. \int^\bullet f d\mu \leq \int^* f d\mu .

It can happen that μ∙(f)≠μ∗(f)\mu^\bullet(f) \neq \mu^*(f); for, the condition μ∗(f)=0\mu^*(f) = 0 means that ff is negligible, whereas the condition μ∙(f)=0\mu^\bullet(f) = 0 means that ff is locally negligible (Ch. IV, §5, No. 2, Prop. 5), and there may exist locally negligible sets that are not negligible (Ch. IV, §1, Exer. 5).

The mapping μ∙\mu^\bullet of F+(T)\mathscr{F}_+(T) into R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}} coincides with μ\mu on K+(T)\mathscr{K}_+(T). It follows that two measures μ1\mu_1 and μ2\mu_2 such that μ1∙=μ2∙\mu_1^\bullet = \mu_2^\bullet are equal.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.