Let Kr,s be the component of H(U+V,−U) of multidegree (r,s). Then
Kn,1(U,V)=(n+1)!1(adU)n(V)for n≥0.
We write K(U,V)=H(U+V,−U), K1(U,V)=∑n≥0Kn,1(U,V). We denote by L (resp. R) left (resp. right) multiplication by U on A^({U,V}).
We can write
eUVe−U=p,q∑p!UpVq!(−U)q=n≥0∑n!1(p+q=n∑p!q!n!(Lp(−R)q)⋅V)=n≥0∑n!1(L−R)nV and therefore
eUVe−U=n≥0∑n!1(adU)nV. We now calculate modulo the ideal
∑m≥0∑n≥2Am,n({U,V}) of
A({U,V}). For all
n≥1,
(U+V)n≡Un+i=1∑n−1UiVUn−1−i whence
(adU)(U+V)n≡((L−R)i=1∑n−1LiRn−i)⋅V≡(Ln−Rn)⋅V≡UnV−VUn. Therefore
(adU)⋅eU+V≡eUV−VeU summing over
n.
On the other hand, K1(U,V)≡K(U,V) and eK1(U,V)≡1+K1(U,V) and hence
K1≡eK−1≡eU+Ve−U−1 by Proposition 3. We deduce that
(ad U)K1≡UeU+Ve−U−eU+Ve−UU≡(eUV−VeU)e−U(by (23))≡eUVe−U−V≡n≥1∑n!1(ad U)nV(by (22))≡(ad U)(n≥0∑(n+1)!(ad U)nV). It then suffices to apply the
Remark of § 2, no. 11.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.