Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 0AE2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AE2].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 5. Formal calculations in Lie groups

(i) ψj≡0mod  deg⁡j\psi_j \equiv 0 \mod \deg j. (ii) If t∈Kt \in \mathbf{K}, then

x[t]=∑i=18(ti)ψi(x) x^{[t]} = \sum_{i=1}^8 \binom{t}{i} \psi_i(x)
where the formal power series on the right is meaningful because of (i).

(We write

(ti)=t(t−1)…(t−i+1)i! \binom{t}{i} = \frac{t(t-1)\ldots(t-i+1)}{i!}

for all t∈Kt \in \mathbf{K}.)

Assertion (i) is obvious from the definition of the ψj\psi_j.

We prove (ii) for tt an integer ≥0\geq 0. By (14),

x[t]=∑α(1),…,α(t)∈Nnaα(1),…,α(t)xα(1)+…+α(t). x^{[t]} = \sum_{\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(t) \in \mathbf{N}^n} a_{\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(t)} x^{\alpha(1) + \ldots + \alpha(t)}.

For α=(α(1),…,α(t))∈(Nn)t\alpha = (\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(t)) \in (\mathbf{N}^n)^t, let σ(α)\sigma(\alpha) denote the set of j∈{1,2,…,t}j \in \{1, 2, \ldots, t\} such that α(j)≠0\alpha(j) \neq 0. If, in the sum (17), we group together the terms for which σ(α)\sigma(\alpha) is the same, then

x[t]=∑σ⊂{1,t}ht,σ(x) x^{[t]} = \sum_{\sigma \subset \{1, t\}} h_{t, \sigma}(x)

where

ht,σ(x)=∑σ(α)=σaα(1),…,α(t)xα(1)+…+α(t). h_{t, \sigma}(x) = \sum_{\sigma(\alpha) = \sigma} a_{\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(t)} x^{\alpha(1) + \ldots + \alpha(t)}.

Let σ={j1,j2,…,jq}\sigma = \{j_1, j_2, \ldots, j_q\} with j1<j2<…<jqj_1 < j_2 < \ldots < j_q. In (14) (where jj is replaced by tt), we substitute 0 for x(k)x(k) for k∉σk \notin \sigma; as 0 is the identity element of GG, we obtain the expansion of x(j1)⋅x(j2)…x(jq)x(j_1) \cdot x(j_2) \ldots x(j_q) as an integral series about the origin:

x(j1)⋅x(j2)…x(jq)=∑σ(α)⊂σaα(1),…,α(t)x(j1)α(j1)x(j2)α(j2)…x(jq)α(jq) x(j_1) \cdot x(j_2) \ldots x(j_q) = \sum_{\sigma(\alpha) \subset \sigma} a_{\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(t)} x(j_1)^{\alpha(j_1)} x(j_2)^{\alpha(j_2)} \ldots x(j_q)^{\alpha(j_q)}

and hence, by the definition of ψq\psi_q:

ψq(x)=∑σ(α)=σaα(1),…,α(t)xα(j1)+…+α(jq). \psi_q(x) = \sum_{\sigma(\alpha) = \sigma} a_{\alpha(1), \ldots, \alpha(t)} x^{\alpha(j_1) + \ldots + \alpha(j_q)}.

By (19) and (20), we see that ht,σ(x)=ψcard σ(x)h_{t, \sigma}(x) = \psi_{\mathrm{card}\,\sigma}(x). Then (18) implies

x[t]=∑i=0t(ti)ψi(x)=∑i=0∞(ti)ψi(x). x^{[t]} = \sum_{i=0}^t \binom{t}{i} \psi_i(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty \binom{t}{i} \psi_i(x).

Then we write x[t]′=∑i=0∞(ti)ψi(x)x^{[t]'} = \sum_{i=0}^\infty \binom{t}{i} \psi_i(x) for all t∈Kt \in \mathbf{K}. In the integral series x[t]x^{[t]} and x[t]′x^{[t]'}, each coefficient is a polynomial function of tt. For this is obvious for x[t]′x^{[t]'}. As far as x[t]x^{[t]} is concerned, it suffices to prove that, for all u∈U(G)u \in \mathrm{U}(G), the image of uu under x↦x[t]x \mapsto x^{[t]} is a polynomial function of tt. Now, for u∈Um(G)u \in \mathrm{U}^m(G), this image is tmut^m u (§ 4, no. 3, Proposition 7 (iv)).

As x[t]=x[t]′x^{[t]} = x^{[t]'} for tt an integer ≥0\geq 0, it then follows that x[t]=x[t]′x^{[t]} = x^{[t]'} for all t∈Kt \in \mathbf{K}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.