Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0ALO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ALO].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 1. Coxeter Groups

Let w and w' be in W. We have the formulas:

l(ww′)≤l(w)+l(w′),(1) l(ww') \leq l(w) + l(w'), \tag{1}
l(w−1)=l(w),(2) l(w^{-1}) = l(w), \tag{2}
∣l(w)−l(w′)∣≤l(ww′−1).(3) |l(w) - l(w')| \leq l(w{w'}^{-1}). \tag{3}

Let (s_1, \ldots, s_p) and (s'_1, \ldots, s'_q) be reduced decompositions of w and w' respectively. Thus l(w) = p and l(w') = q. Since ww' = s_1 \ldots s_p s'_1 \ldots s'_q, we have l(ww') \leq p + q, proving (1). Since S = S^{-1} and w^{-1} = s_p^{-1} \ldots s_1^{-1}, we have l(w^{-1}) \leq p = l(w). Replacing w by w^{-1} gives the opposite inequality l(w) \leq l(w^{-1}), proving (2). Replacing w by ww'^{-1} in (1) and (2) gives the relations

l(w)−l(w′)≤l(ww′−1),(4) l(w) - l(w') \leq l(w{w'}^{-1}), \tag{4}
l(ww′−1)=l(w′w−1).(5) l(w{w'}^{-1}) = l(w'w^{-1}). \tag{5}

Exchanging ww and w′w' in (4) gives l(w′)−l(w)≤l(ww′−1)l(w') - l(w) \leq l(w{w'}^{-1}) by (5), proving (3).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.