Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0ARM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ARM].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 4. The geometric representation of a Coxeter group

Let s,s′∈Ss, s' \in S, with s≠s′s \neq s', and let v∈Ws,s′v \in W_{s,s'}. Then v(As∩As′)v(A_s \cap A_{s'}) is contained in either AsA_s or in s(As)s(A_s), and in the second case l(sv)=l(v)−1l(sv) = l(v) - 1.

The proof will be given in no. 5.

We apply the lemma to the element v=s′uv = s'u. There are two possibilities: either

s′u(As∩As′)⊂Asandafortioriw(C)⊂As, s'u(A_s \cap A_{s'}) \subset A_s \quad \text{and} \quad a fortiori \quad w(C) \subset A_s,
or
s′u(As∩As′)⊂s(As)andafortioriw(C)⊂s(As). s'u(A_s \cap A_{s'}) \subset s(A_s) \quad \text{and} \quad a fortiori \quad w(C) \subset s(A_s).
Moreover, in the second case, l(ss′u)=l(s′u)−1l(ss'u) = l(s'u) - 1. Hence
l(sw)=l(ss′w′)=l(ss′u.u−1w′)≤l(ss′u)+l(u−1w′)=l(s′u)+l(u−1w′)−1≤l(w)−1, l(sw) = l(ss'w') = l(ss'u.u^{-1}w') \leq l(ss'u) + l(u^{-1}w') = l(s'u) + l(u^{-1}w') - 1 \leq l(w) - 1,
and we know that this implies that l(sw)=l(w)−1l(sw) = l(w) - 1.

Proof that ((P_{n+1}) and (Q_n)) \Longrightarrow (Q_{n+1}).

Let w \in W, with l(w) = n + 1, and s, s' \in S, s \neq s'. If w(C) is contained in A_s \cap A_{s'}, condition (Q_{n+1}) is satisfied with u = 1. For if not, suppose for example that w(C) is not contained in A_s. By (P_{n+1}), w(C) \subset s(A_s) and l(sw) = n. By (Q_n), applied to sw, there exists v \in W_{s,s'} such that

sw(C) \subset v(A_s \cap A_{s'}) \quad \text{and} \quad l(sw) = l(v) + l(v^{-1}sw).

Then

w(C) \subset sv(A_s \cap A_{s'})

and

l(w) = 1 + l(sw) = 1 + l(v) + l(v^{-1}sw) \geq l(sv) + l((sv)^{-1}w) \geq l(w),

so the inequalities above must be equalities. It follows that (Q_{n+1}) is satisfied with u = sv.

Proof of the theorem.

Let w \in W, with w \neq 1. We can write w in the form sw' with s \in S and l(w') = l(w) - 1. By (P_n), applied to w' and n = l(w'), we have w'(C) \subset A_s, since the case w'(C) \subset s(A_s) is excluded because l(sw') = l(w) = l(w') + 1. So w(C) = sw'(C) \subset s(A_s), and since A_s and s(A_s) are disjoint, we have C \cap w(C) = \varnothing. Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.