Lemma 1
Tag 0ARM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ARM].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 4. The geometric representation of a Coxeter group
Let , with , and let . Then is contained in either or in , and in the second case .
The proof will be given in no. 5.
We apply the lemma to the element . There are two possibilities: either
Proof that ((P_{n+1}) and (Q_n)) \Longrightarrow (Q_{n+1}).
Let w \in W, with l(w) = n + 1, and s, s' \in S, s \neq s'. If w(C) is contained in A_s \cap A_{s'}, condition (Q_{n+1}) is satisfied with u = 1. For if not, suppose for example that w(C) is not contained in A_s. By (P_{n+1}), w(C) \subset s(A_s) and l(sw) = n. By (Q_n), applied to sw, there exists v \in W_{s,s'} such that
sw(C) \subset v(A_s \cap A_{s'}) \quad \text{and} \quad l(sw) = l(v) + l(v^{-1}sw).
Then
w(C) \subset sv(A_s \cap A_{s'})
and
l(w) = 1 + l(sw) = 1 + l(v) + l(v^{-1}sw) \geq l(sv) + l((sv)^{-1}w) \geq l(w),
so the inequalities above must be equalities. It follows that (Q_{n+1}) is satisfied with u = sv.
Proof of the theorem.
Let w \in W, with w \neq 1. We can write w in the form sw' with s \in S and l(w') = l(w) - 1. By (P_n), applied to w' and n = l(w'), we have w'(C) \subset A_s, since the case w'(C) \subset s(A_s) is excluded because l(sw') = l(w) = l(w') + 1. So w(C) = sw'(C) \subset s(A_s), and since A_s and s(A_s) are disjoint, we have C \cap w(C) = \varnothing. Q.E.D.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.