Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0AZG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AZG].

General Topology, chapter I, § 1. Open sets, neighbourhoods, closed sets

The union of a locally finite family of closed subsets of a topological space XX is closed in XX.

Let (Fi)i∈I(F_i)_{i \in I} be a locally finite family of closed subsets of XX, and suppose that x∈Xx \in X does not belong to F=⋃i∈IFiF = \bigcup_{i \in I} F_i; then xx has a neighbourhood VV which meets only those FiF_i whose indices belong to a finite subset JJ of II. For each i∈Ji \in J let UiU_i be the complement of FiF_i; then ∁F\complement F contains the set V∩⋂i∈JUiV \cap \bigcap_{i \in J} U_i, which is a neighbourhood of xx since each UiU_i is open and contains xx. Hence, by Proposition 1 of no. 2, ∁F\complement F is open and therefore FF is closed in XX.

We note that the union of an arbitrary family of closed subsets of XX is not necessarily closed; for example, on the rational line Q\mathbf{Q}, the set ]2,1[]2, 1[ is the union of the closed sets

[1n,1−1n]for n>2, \left[ \frac{1}{n}, 1 - \frac{1}{n} \right] \quad \text{for } n > 2,
but is not closed.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.