Library / General Topology / Chapter IV / § 5
Proposition 12
Tag 0BRR, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BRR].
General Topology, chapter IV, § 5. Real-valued functions
Let f f f and g g g be two real-valued functions defined on a set X X X , and let A A A be a non-empty subset of X X X .
(i) We have
sup x ∈ A ( f ( x ) + g ( x ) ) ≤ sup x ∈ A f ( x ) + sup x ∈ A g ( x ) , sup x ∈ A f ( x ) + inf x ∈ A g ( x ) ≤ sup x ∈ A ( f ( x ) + g ( x ) ) ,
\begin{align*}
&\sup_{x \in A} (f(x) + g(x)) \leq \sup_{x \in A} f(x) + \sup_{x \in A} g(x), \\
&\sup_{x \in A} f(x) + \inf_{x \in A} g(x) \leq \sup_{x \in A} (f(x) + g(x)),
\end{align*}
x ∈ A sup ( f ( x ) + g ( x )) ≤ x ∈ A sup f ( x ) + x ∈ A sup g ( x ) , x ∈ A sup f ( x ) + x ∈ A inf g ( x ) ≤ x ∈ A sup ( f ( x ) + g ( x )) , whenever both sides of these inequalities are defined.
(ii) If f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) and g ( x ) g(x) g ( x ) are ≥ 0 \geq 0 ≥ 0 for each x ∈ A x \in A x ∈ A , then
(19)
sup x ∈ A ( f ( x ) g ( x ) ) ≤ sup x ∈ A f ( x ) sup x ∈ A g ( x ) ,
\sup_{x \in A} (f(x)g(x)) \leq \sup_{x \in A} f(x) \sup_{x \in A} g(x),
x ∈ A sup ( f ( x ) g ( x )) ≤ x ∈ A sup f ( x ) x ∈ A sup g ( x ) , (20)
sup x ∈ A f ( x ) inf x ∈ A g ( x ) ≤ sup x ∈ A ( f ( x ) g ( x ) )
\sup_{x \in A} f(x) \inf_{x \in A} g(x) \leq \sup_{x \in A} (f(x)g(x))
x ∈ A sup f ( x ) x ∈ A inf g ( x ) ≤ x ∈ A sup ( f ( x ) g ( x )) whenever both sides of these inequalities are defined.
(iii) If f ( x ) ≥ 0 f(x) \geq 0 f ( x ) ≥ 0 for all x ∈ A x \in A x ∈ A , then (21)
sup x ∈ A ( 1 / f ( x ) ) = 1 / inf x ∈ A f ( x )
\sup_{x \in A} (1/f(x)) = 1/\inf_{x \in A} f(x)
x ∈ A sup ( 1/ f ( x )) = 1/ x ∈ A inf f ( x ) (putting 1 / 0 = + ∞ 1/0 = +\infty 1/0 = + ∞ ).
Let H H H be any finite subset of A A A . If x 0 x_0 x 0 is one of the points of H H H where f + g f + g f + g takes its greatest value, then we have
f ( x 0 ) + g ( x 0 ) ≤ sup x ∈ H f ( x ) + sup x ∈ H g ( x ) ;
f(x_0) + g(x_0) \leq \sup_{x \in H} f(x) + \sup_{x \in H} g(x);
f ( x 0 ) + g ( x 0 ) ≤ x ∈ H sup f ( x ) + x ∈ H sup g ( x ) ; on the other hand, if
x 1 x_1 x 1 is one of the points of
H H H where
f f f takes its greatest value, then
f ( x 1 ) + g ( x 1 ) ≥ sup x ∈ H f ( x ) + inf x ∈ H g ( x ) ;
f(x_1) + g(x_1) \geq \sup_{x \in H} f(x) + \inf_{x \in H} g(x);
f ( x 1 ) + g ( x 1 ) ≥ x ∈ H sup f ( x ) + x ∈ H inf g ( x ) ; therefore
sup x ∈ H f ( x ) + inf x ∈ H g ( x ) ≤ sup x ∈ H ( f ( x ) + g ( x ) ) ≤ sup x ∈ H f ( x ) + sup x ∈ H g ( x ) .
\sup_{x \in H} f(x) + \inf_{x \in H} g(x) \leq \sup_{x \in H} (f(x) + g(x)) \leq \sup_{x \in H} f(x) + \sup_{x \in H} g(x).
x ∈ H sup f ( x ) + x ∈ H inf g ( x ) ≤ x ∈ H sup ( f ( x ) + g ( x )) ≤ x ∈ H sup f ( x ) + x ∈ H sup g ( x ) . The inequalities (17) and (18) follow from this by applying Proposition 5 of no. 4 and Theorem 1 of no. 2. The proofs of the other inequalities are analogous.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.