Bourbaki

Proposition 18

Tag 0C38, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C38].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 2. Metric spaces and metrizable spaces

Let XX be a complete metric space, let RR be an open equivalence relation on XX such that X/RX/R is Hausdorff, and let φ:X→X/R\varphi : X \to X/R be the canonical mapping. Then if KK is any compact subset of X/RX/R, there is a compact subset K′K' of XX such that φ(K′)=K\varphi(K') = K.

Let B1\mathscr{B}_1 be the set of all open balls of radius 1/21/2 in XX. As BB runs through B1\mathscr{B}_1, the sets φ(B)\varphi(B) form an open covering of KK, and therefore there exists a finite number of points x1,…,xmx_1, \ldots, x_m of XX such that the images under φ\varphi of the open balls with radius 1/21/2 and centre xix_i (1≤i≤m1 \leq i \leq m) form an open covering of KK. Let H1={x1,…,xm}H_1 = \{ x_1, \ldots, x_m \} and suppose that we have defined a finite set HiH_i, for 1<i≤n1 < i \leq n, such that:

(i) Hi⊂Hi+1H_i \subset H_{i+1} and each point of Hi+1H_{i+1} is at a distance <1/2i< 1/2^i from HiH_i, for 1≤i≤n−11 \leq i \leq n - 1;

(ii) the images under φ\varphi of the open balls of radius 1/2i1/2^i, with centres at the points of HiH_i, form an open covering of KK, for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n.

Let Bn+1\mathscr{B}_{n+1} be the set of all open balls of radius 1/2n+11/2^{n+1} whose centre xx is such that d(x,Hn)<1/2nd(x, H_n) < 1/2^n (dd being the metric on XX). The properties of HnH_n show that the sets φ(B)\varphi(B), for B∈Bn+1B \in \mathscr{B}_{n+1}, form an open covering of KK; hence there is a finite set Ln+1⊂XL_{n+1} \subset X such that the images under φ\varphi of the open balls of radius 1/2n+11/2^{n+1} whose centre belongs to Ln+1L_{n+1} form an open covering of KK. Taking Hn+1=Hn∪Ln+1H_{n+1} = H_n \cup L_{n+1}, we see that we can define inductively an infinite sequence (Hn)(H_n) of finite subsets of XX with properties (i) and (ii) above. Let H=⋃nHnH = \bigcup_n H_n, and let us show that HH is precompact. For each p>0p > 0 and each point zn+p∈Hn+pz_{n+p} \in H_{n+p}, there exists a sequence of points zn+i∈Hn+iz_{n+i} \in H_{n+i} (0≤i≤p−10 \leq i \leq p - 1) such that

d(zn+i,zn+i+1)<1/2n+ifor 0≤i≤p−1; d(z_{n+i}, z_{n+i+1}) < 1/2^{n+i} \quad \text{for } 0 \leq i \leq p - 1;

it follows that d(zn,zn+p)≤∑i=0p−11/2n+i≤1/2n−1d(z_n, z_{n+p}) \leq \sum_{i=0}^{p-1} 1/2^{n+i} \leq 1/2^{n-1}, and consequently d(y,Hn)≤1/2n−1d(y, H_n) \leq 1/2^{n-1} for all y∈Hy \in H, which proves our assertion. Since XX is complete, H‾\overline{H} is compact, hence φ(H‾)\varphi(\overline{H}) is compact. Next, let us show that K⊂φ(H‾)K \subset \varphi(\overline{H}). If z∈Kz \in K, then by definition d(H‾n,φ‾(z))≤1/2nd(\overline{H}_n, \overline{\varphi}(z)) \leq 1/2^n for all nn, and therefore d(H‾,φ‾(z))=0d(\overline{H}, \overline{\varphi}(z)) = 0; but φ‾(z)\overline{\varphi}(z) is closed and H‾\overline{H} is compact, so that this implies H‾∩φ‾(z)≠∅\overline{H} \cap \overline{\varphi}(z) \neq \emptyset (no. 2, Remark following Proposition 3); hence the assertion. Thus if K′=H‾∩φ‾(K)K' = \overline{H} \cap \overline{\varphi}(K), then K′K' is closed in H‾\overline{H} and therefore compact, and from what has been proved we have φ(K′)=K\varphi(K') = K.

Q.E.D.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.