The element 1−T of Z((T)) is invertible. For every integer r>0 one has
(1−T)−r=n∈Z∑[n+r−1r−1]Tn=n∈N∑(r−1n+r−1)Tn.
In fact, 1−T is invertible in the ring Z[[T]], with inverse ∑m≥0Tm; one therefore has
(1−T)−r=(m≥0∑Tm)r=m1,...,mr≥0∑Tm1+m2+...+mr,
and the announced formula follows from E, III, p. 44, prop. 15.
Let Q(T)∈Z[T,T−1], let r be an integer >0, and let F=(1−T)−rQ∈Z((T)). Put
Q(T)=i∈Z∑aiTi,F=n∈Z∑αnTn.
Then, by lemma 1, one has
αn=i∈Z∑ai[n−i+r−1r−1]=i≤n∑ai(r−1n−i+r−1).
Let n1 be the least upper bound in R of the set of integers i∈Z such that ai=0. For every integer n≥n1, one has αn=α~(n), where α~ is the polynomial of Q[X] defined by
α~(X)=(r−1)!1i∈Z∑aij=1∏r−1(X−i+j).
If one sets c=Q(1)=∑i∈Zai, one has α~(X)=cXr−1/(r−1)!+θ(X), where θ is a polynomial of degree ≤r−2. Consequently, one has
αn=c(r−1)!nr−1+ρnnr−2,
where the rational number ρn tends to a limit as n increases indefinitely. Hence one deduces the relation
Q(1)=(r−1)!n→∞limn1−rαn.
If F=∑n∈ZanTn and G=∑n∈ZbnTn are two elements of Z((T)), one denotes by “ F≤G ” the relation “ an≤bn for all n∈Z ”. This is an order relation compatible with the ring structure of Z((T)) (A, VI, p. 18, Def. 1). One has (1−T)−1≥1. If Q∈Z[T,T−1] is ≥0, then the integer Q(1) is positive.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.