Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0CO2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CO2].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 4. Séries de Hilbert-Samuel

a) Let FF be a nonzero element of Z((T))\mathbf{Z}((T)) such that there exists r∈Zr \in \mathbf{Z}, with (1−T)rF∈Z[T,T−1](1-T)^r F \in \mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}]; then FF can be written uniquely in the form F=(1−T)−d.QF = (1-T)^{-d}.Q, where Q∈Z[T,T−1]Q \in \mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}], Q(1)≠0Q(1) \neq 0 and d∈Zd \in \mathbf{Z}. If F≥0F \geq 0, then one has Q(1)>0Q(1) > 0 and d≥0d \geq 0.

b) Let Q,RQ, R be in Z[T,T−1]\mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}], d,d′d, d' in Z\mathbf{Z} with Q(1)>0Q(1) > 0. If

(1−T)−d.Q≤(1−T)−d′.R, (1-T)^{-d}.Q \leq (1-T)^{-d'}.R,

then either d<d′d < d', or else d=d′d = d' and Q(1)≤R(1)Q(1) \leq R(1).

a) We may write F=(1−T)−rTnP(T)F = (1-T)^{-r} T^n P(T) with r,n∈Zr, n \in \mathbf{Z} and P(T)∈Z[T]P(T) \in \mathbf{Z}[T]. By euclidean division, we may write P(T)=(1−T)pR(T)P(T) = (1-T)^p R(T) with R(T)∈Z[T]R(T) \in \mathbf{Z}[T] and R(1)≠0R(1) \neq 0. Hence F=(1−T)−(r−p)Q(T)F = (1-T)^{-(r-p)} Q(T), where Q(T)=TnR(T)∈Z[T,T−1]Q(T) = T^n R(T) \in \mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}] and Q(1)≠0Q(1) \neq 0. This proves the existence of dd and QQ. Moreover, if (1−T)rQ(T)=(1−T)sR(T)(1-T)^r Q(T) = (1-T)^s R(T) with r>sr > s and Q,RQ, R in Z[T,T−1]\mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}], we have R(T)=(1−T)r−sQ(T)R(T) = (1-T)^{r-s} Q(T), hence R(1)=0R(1) = 0; this proves the uniqueness. Suppose that FF is ≥0\geq 0; if we had d<0d < 0, then we should have F(1)=0F(1) = 0, which is impossible since FF is nonzero and all its coefficients are positive; thus we have d≥0d \geq 0. If d=0d = 0, then Q=F≥0Q = F \geq 0, hence Q(1)Q(1) is positive. If d≥1d \geq 1, then Q(1)Q(1) is positive by formula (3). This proves a).

b) Suppose d≥d′d \geq d'. Then (1−T)−d((1−T)d−d′R−Q)≥0(1-T)^{-d} ((1-T)^{d-d'} R - Q) \geq 0; since S(T)=(1−T)d−d′R−QS(T) = (1-T)^{d-d'} R - Q belong to Z[T,T−1]\mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}], this implies S(1)≥0S(1) \geq 0 by what precedes. If d>d′d > d', we have S(1)=−Q(1)<0S(1) = -Q(1) < 0, whence a contradiction; if d=d′d = d', we have S(1)=R(1)−Q(1)S(1) = R(1) - Q(1), whence Q(1)≤R(1)Q(1) \leq R(1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.