Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0CO3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CO3].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 4. Séries de Hilbert-Samuel

The element QMQ_M of Z((T))\mathbf{Z}((T)) belongs to Z[T,T−1]\mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}].

Dividing H0H_0 by the annihilator of the H0H_0-module MM, one is reduced to the case where MM is a faithful H0H_0-module. If a,b∈Za, b \in \mathbf{Z} are such that MM is generated as an HH-module by M′=∑a≤i≤bMiM' = \sum_{a \leq i \leq b} M_i, then M′M' is a faithful H0H_0-module of finite length; hence the ring H0H_0 is artinian (A, VIII, § 1, No. 3), therefore noetherian (loc. cit., § 9, No. 1). The polynomial ring HH is therefore noetherian (loc. cit., § 1, No. 4). If II is empty, then H=H0H = H_0, and the family of integers (long⁡H0(Mn))n∈Z(\operatorname{long}_{H_0}(M_n))_{n \in \mathbf{Z}} has finite support, since MM is a finitely generated H0H_0-module; whence the theorem in this case. Let us then argue by induction on the cardinal of the set II, assumed nonempty; let j∈Ij \in I and J=I−{j}J = I - \{j\}. Let H′H' denote the graded subring of HH generated by H0H_0 and the XiX_i for ii in JJ; consider the homothety (Xj)M(X_j)_M of ratio XjX_j in MM, its kernel RR, and its cokernel SS. For each n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z} there is an exact sequence of H0H_0-modules

0→Rn−dj→Mn−dj→Mn→Sn→0, 0 \to R_{n-d_j} \to M_{n-d_j} \to M_n \to S_n \to 0 ,

therefore Rn−djR_{n-d_j} and SnS_n are of finite length, and one has

long⁡H0(Mn)−long⁡H0(Mn−dj)=long⁡H0(Sn)−long⁡H0(Rn−dj). \operatorname{long}_{H_0}(M_n) - \operatorname{long}_{H_0}(M_{n-d_j}) = \operatorname{long}_{H_0}(S_n) - \operatorname{long}_{H_0}(R_{n-d_j}) .

Since MM is a finitely generated module over the noetherian ring HH, the HH-modules RR and SS are finitely generated; since they are annihilated by XjX_j, they are finitely generated H′H'-modules. By the induction hypothesis, the elements PR⋅∏i∈J(1−Tdi)P_R \cdot \prod_{i \in J} (1 - T^{d_i}) and PS⋅∏i∈J(1−Tdi)P_S \cdot \prod_{i \in J} (1 - T^{d_i}) of Z((T))\mathbf{Z}((T)) therefore belong to Z[T,T−1]\mathbf{Z}[T, T^{-1}]; from (4), one derives

PM−Tdj⋅PM=PS−Tdj⋅PR, P_M - T^{d_j} \cdot P_M = P_S - T^{d_j} \cdot P_R ,

that is, (1−Tdj)⋅PM=PS−Tdj⋅PR(1 - T^{d_j}) \cdot P_M = P_S - T^{d_j} \cdot P_R; hence

PM⋅∏i∈I(1−Tdi)=PS⋅∏i∈J(1−Tdi)−Tdj⋅PR⋅∏i∈J(1−Tdi), P_M \cdot \prod_{i \in I} (1 - T^{d_i}) = P_S \cdot \prod_{i \in J} (1 - T^{d_i}) - T^{d_j} \cdot P_R \cdot \prod_{i \in J} (1 - T^{d_i}) ,

whence the conclusion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.