The element QM of Z((T)) belongs to Z[T,T−1].
Dividing H0 by the annihilator of the H0-module M, one is reduced to the case where M is a faithful H0-module. If a,b∈Z are such that M is generated as an H-module by M′=∑a≤i≤bMi, then M′ is a faithful H0-module of finite length; hence the ring H0 is artinian (A, VIII, § 1, No. 3), therefore noetherian (loc. cit., § 9, No. 1). The polynomial ring H is therefore noetherian (loc. cit., § 1, No. 4). If I is empty, then H=H0, and the family of integers (longH0(Mn))n∈Z has finite support, since M is a finitely generated H0-module; whence the theorem in this case. Let us then argue by induction on the cardinal of the set I, assumed nonempty; let j∈I and J=I−{j}. Let H′ denote the graded subring of H generated by H0 and the Xi for i in J; consider the homothety (Xj)M of ratio Xj in M, its kernel R, and its cokernel S. For each n∈Z there is an exact sequence of H0-modules
0→Rn−dj→Mn−dj→Mn→Sn→0,
therefore Rn−dj and Sn are of finite length, and one has
longH0(Mn)−longH0(Mn−dj)=longH0(Sn)−longH0(Rn−dj).
Since M is a finitely generated module over the noetherian ring H, the H-modules R and S are finitely generated; since they are annihilated by Xj, they are finitely generated H′-modules. By the induction hypothesis, the elements PR⋅∏i∈J(1−Tdi) and PS⋅∏i∈J(1−Tdi) of Z((T)) therefore belong to Z[T,T−1]; from (4), one derives
PM−Tdj⋅PM=PS−Tdj⋅PR,
that is, (1−Tdj)⋅PM=PS−Tdj⋅PR; hence
PM⋅i∈I∏(1−Tdi)=PS⋅i∈J∏(1−Tdi)−Tdj⋅PR⋅i∈J∏(1−Tdi),
whence the conclusion.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.