Let M be a graded H-module. Suppose that M is generated by M0 and that M0 is an H0-module of finite length. Then one has
PM≤(1−T)−rlongH0(M0),cM≤longH0(M0). Moreover, the following conditions are equivalent: (i)
cM=longH0(M0); (ii)
PM=longH0(M0)⋅(1−T)−r, that is to say
M=M0 if
r=0 and
longH0(Mn)=longH0(M0)(r−1n+r−1) for
n∈N if
r>0; (iii) the canonical homomorphism of
H-modules
φ:H⊗H0M0→M is bijective.
Let R denote the kernel of φ. Since φ is surjective, one has
PM=PH⊗M0−PR=longH0(M0)(1−T)−r−PRandcM=longH0(M0)−cR. The conditions (i), (ii) and (iii) are respectively equivalent to
cR=0,
PR=0 and
R=0. Hence one has (iii)
⇒ (ii)
⇒ (i), and it is enough to prove that
cR=0 implies
R=0. Suppose
R=0 and let
0=Nh⊂Nh−1⊂...⊂N0=M0 be a Jordan-Hölder sequence of the
H0-module
M0. Let
Rm be the intersection of
R and of the image of
H⊗H0Nm in
H⊗H0M0; there exists an integer
m between 1 and
h such that
Rm=Rm−1. Put
L=Rm−1/Rm; one has
0≤cL≤cR and it is enough to prove that
cL=0. Now, if
k is the quotient field of
H0 by the maximal annihilator ideal of
Nm−1/Nm,
L is identified with a nonzero graded submodule of
k[(Xi)i∈I]. Hence
L contains a submodule isomorphic to a shifted module of
k[(Xi)i∈I]; since
ck[(Xi)i∈I]=1, one therefore has
cL≥1 (Remarks 2 and 3), which was to be proved.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.