Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 0COC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0COC].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 4. Séries de Hilbert-Samuel

Let MM be a graded HH-module. Suppose that MM is generated by M0M_0 and that M0M_0 is an H0H_0-module of finite length. Then one has

PM≤(1−T)−rlongH0(M0),cM≤longH0(M0). P_M \leq (1 - T)^{-r} \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0), \quad c_M \leq \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0).
Moreover, the following conditions are equivalent: (i) cM=longH0(M0)c_M = \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0); (ii) PM=longH0(M0)⋅(1−T)−rP_M = \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0) \cdot (1 - T)^{-r}, that is to say M=M0M = M_0 if r=0r = 0 and
longH0(Mn)=longH0(M0)(n+r−1r−1) \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_n) = \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0) \binom{n + r - 1}{r - 1}
for n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N} if r>0r > 0; (iii) the canonical homomorphism of HH-modules
φ:H⊗H0M0→M \varphi : H \otimes_{H_0} M_0 \to M
is bijective.

Let RR denote the kernel of φ\varphi. Since φ\varphi is surjective, one has

PM=PH⊗M0−PR=longH0(M0)(1−T)−r−PRandcM=longH0(M0)−cR. P_M = P_{H \otimes M_0} - P_R = \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0) (1 - T)^{-r} - P_R \quad \text{and} \quad c_M = \mathrm{long}_{H_0}(M_0) - c_R.
The conditions (i), (ii) and (iii) are respectively equivalent to cR=0c_R = 0, PR=0P_R = 0 and R=0R = 0. Hence one has (iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i), and it is enough to prove that cR=0c_R = 0 implies R=0R = 0. Suppose R≠0R \neq 0 and let 0=Nh⊂Nh−1⊂...⊂N0=M00 = N^h \subset N^{h-1} \subset ... \subset N^0 = M_0 be a Jordan-Hölder sequence of the H0H_0-module M0M_0. Let RmR^m be the intersection of RR and of the image of H⊗H0NmH \otimes_{H_0} N^m in H⊗H0M0H \otimes_{H_0} M_0; there exists an integer mm between 1 and hh such that Rm≠Rm−1R^m \neq R^{m-1}. Put L=Rm−1/RmL = R^{m-1}/R^m; one has 0≤cL≤cR0 \leq c_L \leq c_R and it is enough to prove that cL≠0c_L \neq 0. Now, if kk is the quotient field of H0H_0 by the maximal annihilator ideal of Nm−1/NmN^{m-1}/N^m, LL is identified with a nonzero graded submodule of k[(Xi)i∈I]k[(X_i)_{i \in I}]. Hence LL contains a submodule isomorphic to a shifted module of k[(Xi)i∈I]k[(X_i)_{i \in I}]; since ck[(Xi)i∈I]=1c_{k[(X_i)_{i \in I}]} = 1, one therefore has cL≥1c_L \geq 1 (Remarks 2 and 3), which was to be proved.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.