Let A be a noetherian ring, q an ideal of A, M a finitely generated A-module such that M/qM is nonzero and of finite length, and F a q-good filtration on M.
a) There exist an integer d ≥0, and an element R of Z[T,T−1], uniquely determined, such that R(1)>0 and HM,F=(1−T)−dR.
b) The integers d and R(1) are independent of the q-good filtration F chosen.
a) Let us consider the graded ring gr(A) such that grn(A)=qn/qn+1 and the graded gr(A)-module gr(M) such that grn(M)=Fn/Fn+1. Since one has Fn1=M and qFn=Fn+1 for n≥n0, gr(M) is generated by ⨁n1≤n≤n0grn(M), hence is finitely generated. Moreover, if (x1,...,xr) is a finite system of generators of the A-module q, gr(A) is generated by gr0(A) and the classes of the xi modulo q2, hence is isomorphic to a quotient graded ring of H=(A/q)[X1,...,Xr]. By Theorem 1 of No. 2, one has
(1−T)rHM,F∈Z[T,T−1]. One has
HM,F=0 and there therefore exist
d∈N and
R∈Z[T,T−1], uniquely determined, such that
R(1)>0 and
HM,F=(1−T)−d.R (Lemma 2 of No. 1).
b) Let F′ be another q-good filtration and let us write analogously
HM,F′=(1−T)−d′R′. By Proposition 3, b), there exists an integer
m such that
(1−T)−d′−1R′≥Tm(1−T)−d−1R. By Lemma 2, b) of No. 1, this implies
d′≥d and, if
d′=d,
R′(1)≥R(1). Exchanging the roles of
F and
F′, one obtains
d=d′ and
R(1)=R′(1).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.