Let A be a noetherian local ring, q an ideal of A distinct from A, and M a finitely generated A-module such that M/qM is of finite length. Then the integer dq(M) is the dimension of the A-module M (§1, No. 4, Def. 8).
One may suppose M=0. Let us prove the inequality dq(M)≤dimA(M). By Cor. 2 to Prop. 9 of §3, No. 5, there exist x1,...,xr∈q, with r=dimA(M) and long(M/∑i=1rxiM)<+∞; let us put x=∑i=1rxiA. By Prop. 4 of No. 3, one has dx(M)≤r; one has x⊂q, whence HM,q(1)≤HM,x(1) and therefore (Lemma 2 of No. 1)
dq(M)≤dx(M)≤r=dimA(M).
Let us now prove, by induction on dimA(M), the inequality dimA(M)≤dq(M), which is obvious when dimA(M)=0.
Suppose that dimA(M)>0, and that dimA(N)≤dq(N) for every finitely generated A-module N such that dimA(N)<dimA(M). If 0=M0⊂M1⊂...⊂Mn=M is a composition series of M, one has dimA(M)=sup(dimA(Mi/Mi−1)) (§1, No. 4, prop. 9) and dq(M)=sup(dq(Mi/Mi−1)) (No. 3, prop. 5). By IV, §1, No. 4, th. 1, one may therefore suppose that M is of the form A/p, where p is a prime ideal of A, and one has p=mA since dimA(M)>0. Let x∈mA−p; the homothety xM of M=A/p is injective, and one has the exact sequence
0⟶MxMM⟶M/xM⟶0.
By §3, No. 2, prop. 3, one has dimA(M/xM)=dimA(M)−1; by prop. 5 of No. 3, and the preceding exact sequence, one has dq(M/xM)≤dq(M)−1. By the induction hypothesis, one therefore has
dimA(M)=dimA(M/xM)+1≤dq(M/xM)+1≤dq(M),
which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.