Proposition 6
Tag 0COY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0COY].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VIII, § 4. Séries de Hilbert-Samuel
Let A be a noetherian ring, M a finitely generated A-module and q an ideal of A such that M/qM is of finite length. Let F be a q-good filtration of M, and let be the graded ring associated with A for the q-adic filtration.
Let be a sequence of elements of A, a sequence of strictly positive integers such that for , and let be the class of in .
a) Endow the A-module with the q-good filtration quotient of F. Then one has in the inequality
b) For there to be equality in (22), it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence of elements of the ring be completely secant for the module .
In that case, the canonical homomorphism of into is an isomorphism.
c) Assume the conditions of b) satisfied, and that each of the A-modules () is separated for the q-adic topology¹. Then the sequence is completely secant for the A-module M.
When , one has and the sequence is completely secant for if and only if the homothety of ratio in is injective. Prop. 6 then follows at once from lemma 7 applied to the homothety in M.
Assume that one has and argue by induction on s. The induction hypothesis applied to the A-module endowed with the filtration G quotient of F, and to the sequence yields the inequality
¹ This occurs in particular if q is contained in the radical of A (III, § 3, no. 3, prop. 6).
there is equality if and only if the sequence is completely secant for the gr(A)-module . Since the elements of are positive, the case already treated and formula (23) yield the inequalities
This proves a).
There can be equality in (22) only if one has simultaneously equality in (23) and the equality
This last relation signifies that is completely secant for gr(M) and implies that the canonical homomorphism of gr(M)/gr(M) into gr(M_1) is an isomorphism. In other words, one has equality in (22) if and only if is completely secant for gr(M) and completely secant for gr(M)/gr(M). This signifies that is completely secant for gr(M) (A, X, p. 160, Corollary 2). Thus the equivalence of the two conditions of b) has been proved. Suppose them satisfied; then, by the induction hypothesis, gr(M) is identified with ; since moreover gr(M_1) is identified with gr(M)/gr(M), the last assertion of b) is therefore satisfied.
Now suppose that is completely secant for gr(M) and M_i separated for the q-adic topology (for ). From the preceding and the induction hypothesis, the sequence is completely secant for M_1; since one has and is completely secant for M, the sequence is completely secant for M (A, X, p. 160, Theorem 1).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.