Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0D0E, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D0E].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 1. Profondeur

Let AA be a ring, JJ an ideal of AA, x=(xi)i∈Ix = (x_i)_{i \in I} a generating family of JJ, MM an AA-module. The depth of MM relative to JJ is the greatest lower bound (in N∪{+∞}\mathbf{N} \cup \{+\infty\}) of the integers nn such that Hn(x,M)≠0H^n(x, M) \neq 0.

Put p=prof⁡A(J;M)p = \operatorname{prof}_A(J; M). Consider the complex K∙(x,M)K^\bullet(x, M). Its homology is annihilated by JJ (A, X, p. 148, Corollary 2), and the depth relative to JJ of each of the modules Ki(x,M)K^i(x, M) is equal to pp or to +∞+\infty (No. 1, Remark 4). It then follows from Corollary 1 of No. 2 that we have Hi(x,M)=0H^i(x, M) = 0 for i<pi < p. It remains to prove that Hp(x,M)H^p(x, M) is non-zero when p<+∞p < +\infty.

The case p=0p = 0 being evident, suppose 0<p<+∞0 < p < +\infty and Hp(x,M)=0H^p(x, M) = 0. Let LL be a free resolution of the AA-module A/JA/J; let CC denote the complex Homgr⁡A(L,M)\operatorname{Homgr}_A(L, M). The AA-module Hi(C)H^i(C) is isomorphic to Ext⁡Ai(A/J,M)\operatorname{Ext}_A^i(A/J, M) (A, X, p. 100, Theorem 1); it is therefore zero for i<pi < p. We then have for i<pi < p canonical exact sequences

0→Bi(C)→Ci→Bi+1(C)→0. 0 \to B^i(C) \to C^i \to B^{i+1}(C) \to 0 .

The AA-module CiC^i is a product of AA-modules isomorphic to MM; therefore Hs(x,Ci)=0H^s(x, C^i) = 0 for s≤ps \leq p. From the preceding exact sequences and from A, X, p. 150, we deduce that the connecting homomorphism ∂s:Hs(x,Bi+1(C))⟶Hs+1(x,Bi(C))\partial^s : H^s(x, B^{i+1}(C)) \longrightarrow H^{s+1}(x, B^i(C)) is injective for s≤ps \leq p and i<pi < p; since B0(C)=0B^0(C) = 0, it follows that Hp−i(x,Bi+1(C))H^{p-i}(x, B^{i+1}(C)) is zero for i<pi < p. In particular, we have H1(x,Bp(C))=0H^1(x, B^p(C)) = 0, so that the exact sequence

0→Bp(C)→Zp(C)→Hp(C)→0 0 \to B^p(C) \to Z^p(C) \to H^p(C) \to 0

yields a surjection H0(x,Zp(C))⟶H0(x,Hp(C))H^0(x, Z^p(C)) \longrightarrow H^0(x, H^p(C)). Since Hp(C)H^p(C) is isomorphic to Ext⁡Ap(A/J,M)\operatorname{Ext}_A^p(A/J, M), which is nonzero and annihilated by J, one has H0(x,Hp(C))≠0H^0(x, H^p(C)) \neq 0, whence H0(x,Zp(C))≠0H^0(x, Z^p(C)) \neq 0 and consequently H0(x,Cp)≠0H^0(x, C^p) \neq 0. But this implies H0(x,M)≠0H^0(x, M) \neq 0, contrary to the hypothesis. Hence Hp(x,M)≠0H^p(x, M) \neq 0, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.