Let A be a local ring, a an ideal of A distinct from A and M an A-module annihilated by a. One has profA(M)=profA/a(M).
Let ρ:A→B be a ring homomorphism, x=(xi)i∈I a finite family of elements of A and M an A-module. For every integer p, let us denote by up:B⊗ACIp(M)→CIp(B⊗AM) the B-linear homomorphism which associates to b⊗m the alternating mapping (α1,…,αp)↦b⊗m(α1,…,αp). The family (up) defines an isomorphism of complexes
u:B⊗AK∙(x,M)→K∙(x,B⊗AM)
Let us consider the canonical homomorphism
γp(B,K∙(x,M)):B⊗AHp(x,M)→Hp(B⊗AK∙(x,M))
(A, X, p. 62); by composition with Hp(u), we deduce from it a homomorphism
vp:B⊗AHp(x,M)→Hp(x,B⊗AM)
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.