Proposition 13
Tag 0D15, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D15].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 1. Profondeur
Let A be a noetherian ring, M a finitely generated A-module, p and q two prime ideals of Supp(M) with p ⊂ q. One has
More precisely, for every saturated chain of prime ideals p ⊂ p_1 ⊂ ... ⊂ p_{r−1} ⊂ q, one has \text{prof}_{A_q}(M_q) \leq \text{prof}_{A_p}(M_p) + r.
Put p = \text{prof}_{A_p}(M_p), and let us prove the second inequality. It is obvious if p = +∞; in the contrary case one has \text{Ext}^p_{A_p}(κ(p), M_p) ≠ 0, whence
by lemma 3, which implies . Since is the least upper bound of the lengths of saturated chains of prime ideals with endpoints and , the first assertion is a consequence of the second.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.