Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0D1A, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D1A].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 1. Profondeur

Let AA be a noetherian ring, FF a closed subset of Spec(A)\mathrm{Spec}(A), UU the complementary open set, and u:M→Nu : M \to N a homomorphism of finitely generated AA-modules.

a) Suppose that up:Mp→Npu_p : M_p \to N_p is injective for every p∈Up \in U and that one has profF(M)⩾1\mathrm{prof}_F(M) \geqslant 1. Then uu is injective.

b) Suppose that up:Mp→Npu_p : M_p \to N_p is bijective for every p∈Up \in U and that one has profF(M)⩾2\mathrm{prof}_F(M) \geqslant 2 and profF(N)⩾1\mathrm{prof}_F(N) \geqslant 1. Then uu is bijective.

a) The hypotheses imply Supp(Ker u)⊂F\mathrm{Supp}(\mathrm{Ker}\,u) \subset F, hence HomA(Ker u,M)=0\mathrm{Hom}_A(\mathrm{Ker}\,u, M) = 0 (No. 5, Remark 1); therefore one has Ker u=0\mathrm{Ker}\,u = 0.

b) One already knows that uu is injective, and one has Supp(Coker u)⊂F\mathrm{Supp}(\mathrm{Coker}\,u) \subset F. By loc. cit., one has HomA(Coker u,N)=0\mathrm{Hom}_A(\mathrm{Coker}\,u, N) = 0 and ExtA1(Coker u,M)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^1(\mathrm{Coker}\,u, M) = 0. From the exact sequence of extension modules

HomA(Coker u,N)→HomA(Coker u,Coker u)→ExtA1(Coker u,M) \mathrm{Hom}_A(\mathrm{Coker}\,u, N) \to \mathrm{Hom}_A(\mathrm{Coker}\,u, \mathrm{Coker}\,u) \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^1(\mathrm{Coker}\,u, M)

one deduces HomA(Coker u,Coker u)=0\mathrm{Hom}_A(\mathrm{Coker}\,u, \mathrm{Coker}\,u) = 0, which implies Coker u=0\mathrm{Coker}\,u = 0.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.