Bourbaki

Proposition 16

Tag 0D1K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D1K].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 1. Profondeur

Let AA be an integrally closed noetherian ring, JJ an ideal of AA of height ⩾2\geqslant 2, and MM a reflexive AA-module of finite type. One has prof⁡A(J;M)⩾2\operatorname{prof}_A(J; M) \geqslant 2.

Let us choose a finite-dimensional vector space VV over the field of fractions of AA and a lattice NN in VV isomorphic to MM (VII, § 4, No. 2, Remark 1). The prime ideals associated with V/NV/N, being of height 1 (loc. cit., Theorem 2), do not contain JJ; after Remark 2 of No. 1, this implies prof⁡A(J;V/N)⩾1\operatorname{prof}_A(J; V/N) \geqslant 1. On the other hand, the AA-module VV is divisible and torsion-free, hence injective (A, X, p. 17, Corollary 2 of Proposition 10), which implies prof⁡A(J;V)=+∞\operatorname{prof}_A(J; V) = +\infty. The inequality prof⁡A(J;N)⩾2\operatorname{prof}_A(J; N) \geqslant 2 then follows from Proposition 1 of No. 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.