Theorem 1
Tag 0D6X, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D6X].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 5. Intersections complètes
Let A be a noetherian ring and J an ideal of A. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) the ideal J is completely secant; (ii) the ideal J is completely secant at every maximal ideal ; (iii) the -module is projective and the canonical homomorphism is bijective; (iv) the -module is projective and the canonical homomorphism is bijective.
(i) ⇒ (ii): this is trivial.
(ii) ⇒ (iii): suppose condition (ii) satisfied. It is enough to prove that for every maximal ideal m of A, the -module is free and the homomorphism is bijective (II, § 5, No. 2, Th. 1 and § 3, No. 3, Th. 1). But these assertions are trivial when m does not belong to V(J), since one then has J_m = A_m, and they result from A, X, p. 160, Th. 1 and p. 161, Remark, when m belongs to V(J).
(iii) ⇒ (iv): this is clear.
(iv) ⇒ (i): suppose condition (iv) satisfied; let p be a prime ideal of A containing J. Then the -module is free. Let x = (x_1, ..., x_r) be a sequence of elements of J_p lifting a basis of . The sequence x generates J_p (Nakayama's Lemma), and satisfies by construction condition (iv) of Prop. 1. It follows that the ideal J_p of A_p is completely secant, and J is completely secant at p.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.