Proposition 4
Tag 0D7V, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D7V].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 6. Extension des scalaires dans les algèbres régulières
Let be a field, a -algebra essentially of finite type and a -algebra.
a) If and are Macaulay rings, the same is true of .
b) If and are Gorenstein rings, the same is true of .
Suppose that and are Macaulay rings (resp. Gorenstein rings), and let us prove that the same is true of . The ring is noetherian (No. 1, cor. of Prop. 2). The -module is free, hence flat. By Prop. 10 of § 2, No. 7 (resp. Cor. 1 of Prop. 12 of § 3, No. 8), it is enough for us to prove that is a Macaulay ring (resp. a Gorenstein ring) for every prime ideal of . The extension of is of finite type (No. 1, Prop. 2 and Example 1); we are therefore reduced to proving the statement in the case where the -algebra is a finite-type extension of .
The ring is then a free -module of finite rank, hence a Macaulay -module. By § 2, No. 6, Cor. 1 of Prop. 8, it is a Macaulay ring, which proves a). Suppose now that is a Gorenstein ring. There exist intermediate extensions , of such that
and such that is a monogenic -algebra for ; this enables us to reduce to the case where the extension of is monogenic (of finite degree). The canonical homomorphism makes into a flat -algebra and, for every , the ring , isomorphic to , is a monogenic -algebra, hence a Gorenstein ring (, n° 9, example 5). Thus is a Gorenstein ring (, n° 8, cor. 1 of Prop. 12), which completes the proof of b).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.