Let k be an algebraically closed field, A a finitely generated k-algebra whose spectrum is connected, n an integer and (x_1, \ldots , x_n) a finite sequence of elements of A . Suppose that A is of dimension n and that the differentials dx_1, \ldots , dx_n generate the A-module \Omega_k(A) . Then the ring A is an integral domain and regular and the A-module \Omega_k(A) is free with basis (dx_1, \ldots , dx_n) .
Let m be a maximal ideal of A such that \dim(A_m) = n . One has [A/m : k] = 1 (V, § 3, No. 3, prop. 1 (iii)), hence A = m \oplus k1_A . Let p and q denote the corresponding projections. For a and b in A, one has
ab=(p(a)q(b)+q(a)p(b)+p(a)p(b),q(a)q(b)), whence
p(ab)≡p(a)q(b)+q(a)p(b)(modm2). Consequently the mapping
δ:A→m/m2 which associates to each element
x of
A the class of
p(x) modulo
m2 is a
k-derivation of
A into the
k-vector space
m/m2. There therefore exists a
A-linear mapping
ϕ:Ωk(A)→m/m2 such that
δ(x)=ϕ(dx) for every
x∈A. Since
δ is surjective, the
ϕ(dxi) generate the
A/m-vector space
m/m2, and one has
[m/m2:A/m]≤n=dim(Am). It follows that
Am is regular and that the images of the
dxi form a basis of the
A/m-vector space
A/m⊗AΩk(A).
Let us now prove that the ring A is an integral domain and regular. There exists a minimal prime ideal q of A such that dim(A/q)=n. For every maximal ideal m of A containing q, one has dim(Am)=n (VIII, § 2, No. 4, cor. 2 to th. 3), so that Am is regular by what we have just seen. In particular Am is an integral domain, which implies qAm=0. Since this holds for all the maximal ideals m of V(q), one deduces that one has Supp(q)∩V(q)=∅. But Spec(A) is connected, V(q) is nonempty and one has Supp(q)∪V(q)=Spec(A) (II, § 4, No. 4, prop. 16). One deduces that Supp(q)=∅, whence q=0, which means that A is an integral domain. One then has dim(Am)=n for every maximal ideal m of A; applying the first part of the proof, one deduces that A is regular.
Finally, let ∑i=1naidxi=0 be a linear relation between the dxi with coefficients in A. If the ai are not all zero, there exists an index i and a maximal ideal m of A such that ai does not belong to m (V, § 3, No. 3, Prop. 1, (iii) and (iv)); but this contradicts the fact proved above that the classes of dxi in (A/m)⊗AΩk(A) are linearly independent.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.