Bourbaki

Lemma 5

Tag 0D8F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D8F].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 6. Extension des scalaires dans les algèbres régulières

Let k be an algebraically closed field, A a finitely generated k-algebra whose spectrum is connected, n an integer and (x_1, \ldots , x_n) a finite sequence of elements of A . Suppose that A is of dimension n and that the differentials dx_1, \ldots , dx_n generate the A-module \Omega_k(A) . Then the ring A is an integral domain and regular and the A-module \Omega_k(A) is free with basis (dx_1, \ldots , dx_n) .

Let m be a maximal ideal of A such that \dim(A_m) = n . One has [A/m : k] = 1 (V, § 3, No. 3, prop. 1 (iii)), hence A = m \oplus k1_A . Let p and q denote the corresponding projections. For aa and bb in AA, one has

ab=(p(a)q(b)+q(a)p(b)+p(a)p(b),q(a)q(b)), ab = (p(a)q(b) + q(a)p(b) + p(a)p(b), q(a)q(b)) ,
whence p(ab)≡p(a)q(b)+q(a)p(b)(modm2)p(ab) \equiv p(a)q(b) + q(a)p(b) \pmod{\mathfrak{m}^2}. Consequently the mapping δ:A→m/m2\delta : A \to \mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2 which associates to each element xx of AA the class of p(x)p(x) modulo m2\mathfrak{m}^2 is a kk-derivation of AA into the kk-vector space m/m2\mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2. There therefore exists a AA-linear mapping ϕ:Ωk(A)→m/m2\phi : \Omega_k(A) \to \mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2 such that δ(x)=ϕ(dx)\delta(x) = \phi(dx) for every x∈Ax \in A. Since δ\delta is surjective, the ϕ(dxi)\phi(dx_i) generate the A/mA/\mathfrak{m}-vector space m/m2\mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2, and one has [m/m2:A/m]≤n=dim⁡(Am)[\mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^2 : A/\mathfrak{m}] \leq n = \dim(A_{\mathfrak{m}}). It follows that AmA_{\mathfrak{m}} is regular and that the images of the dxidx_i form a basis of the A/mA/\mathfrak{m}-vector space A/m⊗AΩk(A)A/\mathfrak{m} \otimes_A \Omega_k(A).

Let us now prove that the ring AA is an integral domain and regular. There exists a minimal prime ideal q\mathfrak{q} of AA such that dim⁡(A/q)=n\dim(A/\mathfrak{q}) = n. For every maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} of AA containing q\mathfrak{q}, one has dim⁡(Am)=n\dim(A_{\mathfrak{m}}) = n (VIII, § 2, No. 4, cor. 2 to th. 3), so that AmA_{\mathfrak{m}} is regular by what we have just seen. In particular AmA_{\mathfrak{m}} is an integral domain, which implies qAm=0\mathfrak{q}A_{\mathfrak{m}} = 0. Since this holds for all the maximal ideals m\mathfrak{m} of V(q)V(\mathfrak{q}), one deduces that one has Supp⁡(q)∩V(q)=∅\operatorname{Supp}(\mathfrak{q}) \cap V(\mathfrak{q}) = \varnothing. But Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A) is connected, V(q)V(\mathfrak{q}) is nonempty and one has Supp⁡(q)∪V(q)=Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Supp}(\mathfrak{q}) \cup V(\mathfrak{q}) = \operatorname{Spec}(A) (II, § 4, No. 4, prop. 16). One deduces that Supp⁡(q)=∅\operatorname{Supp}(\mathfrak{q}) = \varnothing, whence q=0\mathfrak{q} = 0, which means that AA is an integral domain. One then has dim⁡(Am)=n\dim(A_{\mathfrak{m}}) = n for every maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} of AA; applying the first part of the proof, one deduces that AA is regular.

Finally, let ∑i=1naidxi=0\sum_{i=1}^n a_i dx_i = 0 be a linear relation between the dxidx_i with coefficients in AA. If the aia_i are not all zero, there exists an index ii and a maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m} of AA such that aia_i does not belong to m\mathfrak{m} (V, § 3, No. 3, Prop. 1, (iii) and (iv)); but this contradicts the fact proved above that the classes of dxidx_i in (A/m)⊗AΩk(A)(A/\mathfrak{m}) \otimes_A \Omega_k(A) are linearly independent.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.