Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 0D95, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D95].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 7. Algèbres lisses

Let k be a ring, A a k-algebra, and J an ideal of A such that the k-algebra A/J is formally smooth. Endow A with the J-adic topology. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) the topological k-algebra A is formally smooth; (ii) the A/JA/J-module J/J2J/J^2 is projective and the canonical homomorphism (§\S 5, n° 2)

β:SA/J(J/J2)→grJ(A) \beta : S_{A/J}(J/J^2) \to \mathrm{gr}_J(A)
is bijective; (iii) the A/JA/J-module J/J2J/J^2 is projective and there exists an isomorphism of topological k-algebras of the separated completion of A onto the completed algebra of the graded algebra SA/J(J/J2)S_{A/J}(J/J^2).

If A is noetherian, these conditions are also equivalent to:

(iv) the ideal J is completely secant.

Let us first observe that (iii) implies (i): indeed, under the hypotheses of (iii), the algebra SA/J(J/J2)S_{A/J}(J/J^2), endowed with the topology associated with its graduation, is formally smooth over A/JA/J (No. 3, example 1), hence over k (No. 2, prop. 3, a)); assertion (i) then follows from prop. 3, c) of No. 2.

Let A^\hat{A} denote the separated completion of the algebra A and J^\hat{J} the separated completion of J. The canonical homomorphism i:A→A^i : A \to \hat{A} induces an isomorphism A/J→A^/J^A/J \to \hat{A}/\hat{J} (III, § 2, No. 12, formula (21)). Let φ:A/J→A^\varphi : A/J \to \hat{A} be a lifting of this isomorphism (No. 4, Prop. 5). Let λ:J^→J/J2\lambda : \hat{J} \to J/J^2 denote the surjection deduced from the canonical isomorphism J/J2→J^/J^2J/J^2 \to \hat{J}/\hat{J}^2 (III, § 2, No. 12, formula (21)). Let aa be an element of A, aˉ\bar{a} its class in A/JA/J, and zz an element of J^\hat{J}; one has φ(aˉ)≡i(a)(modJ^)\varphi(\bar{a}) \equiv i(a) \pmod{\hat{J}}, whence φ(aˉ)z≡i(a)z(modJ^2)\varphi(\bar{a})z \equiv i(a)z \pmod{\hat{J}^2} and λ(φ(aˉ)z)=λ(i(a)z)=aˉλ(z)\lambda(\varphi(\bar{a})z) = \lambda(i(a)z) = \bar{a}\lambda(z). In other words, λ\lambda is A/J-linear when J^\hat{J} is endowed with the structure of an A/J-module deduced from φ\varphi.

Suppose that the homomorphism λ\lambda admits an A/J-linear section σ:J/J2→J^\sigma : J/J^2 \to \hat{J}. Let S denote the graded k-algebra SA/J(J/J2)S_{A/J}(J/J^2) and S^\hat{S} its completion. Let

θ:S→A^ \theta : S \to \hat{A}
be the homomorphism of k-algebras such that θ(x)=φ(x)\theta(x) = \varphi(x) for xx in S0=A/JS^0 = A/J, and θ(x)=σ(x)\theta(x) = \sigma(x) for xx in S1=J/J2S^1 = J/J^2. Since θ\theta maps S1S^1 into J^\hat{J}, it maps SnS^n into J^n\hat{J}^n and therefore extends to a continuous homomorphism θ^:S^→A^\hat{\theta} : \hat{S} \to \hat{A}. The mapping gr1(θ):J/J2→J^/J^2\mathrm{gr}_1(\theta) : J/J^2 \to \hat{J}/\hat{J}^2 is the composite of σ\sigma with the canonical surjection J^→J^/J^2\hat{J} \to \hat{J}/\hat{J}^2; since σ\sigma is a section of λ\lambda, gr1(θ)\mathrm{gr}_1(\theta) coincides with the canonical isomorphism of J/J2J/J^2 onto J^/J^2\hat{J}/\hat{J}^2. It follows that gr(θ):S→grJ^(A^)\mathrm{gr}(\theta) : S \to \mathrm{gr}_{\hat{J}}(\hat{A}) is the composite of the canonical surjection β\beta with the canonical isomorphism grJ(A)→grJ^(A^)\mathrm{gr}_J(A) \to \mathrm{gr}_{\hat{J}}(\hat{A}) (III, § 2, No. 12, formula (22)).

Let us now prove the implication (ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii). Under assumption (ii), the A/J-module J/J2J/J^2 is projective, and therefore λ\lambda admits an A/J-linear section; the homomorphism θ^:S^→A^\hat{\theta} : \hat{S} \to \hat{A} associated with this section by the preceding construction induces by

Let us prove (i) ⇒ (ii). Suppose that the topological k-algebra A is formally smooth. Let us first prove that the A/J-module J/J^2 is projective. Let M be a Λ/J-module and f:M→J/J2f : M \to J/J^2 a surjective A/J-linear mapping; the question is to prove that f admits a Λ/J-linear section.

Let π denote the canonical surjection A/J2→A/JA/J^2 \to A/J. By Remark 1 of No. 2, there exists an isomorphism of k-algebras ψ : A/J ⊕ J/J^2 → A/J^2 such that π(ψ(y, z)) = y and ψ(0, z) = z for y∈A/Jy \in A/J, z∈J/J2z \in J/J^2. Consider the k-algebra (A/J) ⊕ M (No. 1, Example) and the mapping u : (A/J) ⊕ M → A/J^2 such that u(x, m) = ψ(x, f(m)). This is a surjective homomorphism of k-algebras, whose kernel is the submodule Ker f of M, and therefore is square zero. The canonical surjection ρ : A → A/J^2 is continuous; since the topological k-algebra A is formally smooth, there exists a homomorphism of k-algebras ŝ : A → (A/J)⊕M such that u◦ŝ = ρ. Since pr_1 = π◦ψ = π◦u, one has pr_1◦ŝ = π◦u◦ŝ = π◦ρ, so that pr_1◦ŝ is the canonical surjection of A onto A/J. Hence one has ŝ(J) ⊂ M and consequently ŝ(J^2) = 0, so that ŝ induces an A/J-linear mapping s : J/J^2 → M. One has u◦ŝ = ρ and pr_2◦ψ^{-1}◦u(y, m) = f(m) for y∈A/Jy \in A/J and m∈Mm \in M. Let x∈Jx \in J, and ū its class in J/J^2; one has f(s(ū)) = f(pr_2(ŝ(x))) = pr_2(ψ^{-1}(ū)) = ū. Thus s is a section of f.

It remains to prove that the homomorphism β is injective. Since the A/J-module J/J^2 is projective, λ admits an A/J-linear section; let θ : S → Ā denote the associated homomorphism. The homomorphism gr(θ) is identified with β. Let m be an integer; let Σ_m denote the graded k-algebra quotient of S by the ideal ∑i>mSi\sum_{i>m} S^i and θm:Σm→A/Jm+1\theta_m : \Sigma_m \to A/J^{m+1} the homomorphism deduced from θ. The composite of θ_m with the canonical surjection A/J^{m+1} → A/J is the canonical projection of Σ_m onto S^0 = A/J; hence the kernel of θ_m is a nilpotent two-sided ideal. By the example of No. 4, there exists a lifting ψ_m : A → Σ_m of the canonical surjection A → A/J^{m+1}. Since the composite of ψ_m with the canonical projection of Σ_m onto A/J is the canonical surjection, ψ_m(J) consists of elements of degree > 0. By passing to associated graded algebras, one deduces from ψ_m a graded k-linear mapping gr(ψ_m) : gr_J(A) → Σ_m such that gr_m(θ)◦gr_m(ψ_m) = Id_{J^m/J^{m+1}}. It follows that gr_m(θ), hence also β_m, is injective, which completes the proof of (ii).

Finally, when A is noetherian, conditions (ii) and (iv) are equivalent (§ 5, No. 2, Th. 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.