Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 0D9C, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D9C].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 7. Algèbres lisses

Let k0k_0 be a ring, kk a k0k_0-algebra, AA a kk-algebra, mm a maximal ideal of AA. Suppose that kk and A/mA/m are formally smooth over k0k_0. In order that AA be formally smooth over kk for the mm-adic topology, it is necessary and sufficient that the following two conditions be satisfied:

(i) the canonical homomorphism SA/m(m/m2)→grm(A)S_{A/m}(m/m^2) \to \mathrm{gr}_m(A) is bijective; (ii) the A/mA/m-linear mapping

ω:A/m⊗kΩk0(k)⟶A/m⊗AΩk0(A) \omega : A/m \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) \longrightarrow A/m \otimes_A \Omega_{k_0}(A)

deduced from the canonical mapping k→Ak \to A is injective.

Let us denote by dk:k→Ωk0(k)d_k : k \to \Omega_{k_0}(k) and dA:A→Ωk0(A)d_A : A \to \Omega_{k_0}(A) the universal k0k_0-derivations.

Suppose first that AA is formally smooth over kk for the mm-adic topology. Then AA is formally smooth over k0k_0 for the mm-adic topology (No. 2, Prop. 3, a)), which is equivalent to (i) (No. 5, Theorem 2). Moreover, the k0k_0-derivation λ↦1⊗dk(λ)\lambda \mapsto 1 \otimes d_k(\lambda) of kk into A/m⊗kΩk0(k)A/m \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) can be extended to a k0k_0-derivation of AA into A/m⊗kΩk0(k)A/m \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) (No. 2, Remark 2). There therefore exists an AA-linear mapping u:Ωk0(A)→A/m⊗kΩk0(k)u : \Omega_{k_0}(A) \to A/m \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) such that u(dA(λ1A))=1⊗dk(λ)u(d_A(\lambda 1_A)) = 1 \otimes d_k(\lambda) for every λ∈k\lambda \in k. The A/mA/m-linear mapping A/m⊗AΩk0(A)⟶A/m⊗kΩk0(k)A/m \otimes_A \Omega_{k_0}(A) \longrightarrow A/m \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) deduced from uu is a retraction of ω\omega, which proves (ii).

Suppose conversely that conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied. Then AA is formally smooth over k0k_0 for the mm-adic topology (No. 5, Theorem 2) and the AA-module Ωk0(A)\Omega_{k_0}(A) is projective (No. 5, Corollary 3 of Theorem 2). Let us fix an integer r⩾0r \geqslant 0 and consider the A/mrA/m^r-linear mapping

ωr:A/mr⊗kΩk0(k)⟶A/mr⊗AΩk0(A) \omega_r : A/m^r \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) \longrightarrow A/m^r \otimes_A \Omega_{k_0}(A)

deduced from the canonical mapping k→Ak \to A. Let (λi)i∈I(\lambda_i)_{i \in I} be a family of elements of kk such that the dk(λi)d_k(\lambda_i) form a basis of the vector space Ωk0(k)\Omega_{k_0}(k) over kk; by (ii), the elements 1⊗dA(λi1A)1 \otimes d_A(\lambda_i 1_A) are linearly independent in A/m⊗AΩk0(A)A/\mathfrak{m} \otimes_{A} \Omega_{k_0}(A). By II, § 3, No. 2, Cor. 1 and 2 of Prop. 5, the 1⊗dA(λi1A)1 \otimes d_A(\lambda_i 1_A) form a basis of a direct factor of the A/mrA/\mathfrak{m}^r-module A/mr⊗AΩk0(A)A/\mathfrak{m}^r \otimes_{A} \Omega_{k_0}(A). There therefore exists an A/mrA/\mathfrak{m}^r-linear mapping

ur:A/mr⊗AΩk0(A)⟶A/mr⊗kΩk0(k) u_r : A/\mathfrak{m}^r \otimes_{A} \Omega_{k_0}(A) \longrightarrow A/\mathfrak{m}^r \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k)
such that ur(1⊗dA(λi1A))=1⊗dk(λi)u_r(1 \otimes d_A(\lambda_i 1_A)) = 1 \otimes d_k(\lambda_i) for all ii, hence ur∘ωr=Idu_r \circ \omega_r = \mathrm{Id}.

Let us now verify that AA is formally smooth over kk for the m\mathfrak{m}-adic topology. Let CC be a kk-algebra, NN a square-zero ideal of CC, and π:C→C/N\pi : C \to C/N the canonical surjection; endow CC and C/NC/N with the discrete topology. Let φ:A→C/N\varphi : A \to C/N be a continuous homomorphism of kk-algebras. Since AA is formally smooth over k0k_0 for the m\mathfrak{m}-adic topology, there exists a continuous homomorphism of k0k_0-algebras φ~0:A→C\tilde{\varphi}_0 : A \to C such that π∘φ~0=φ\pi \circ \tilde{\varphi}_0 = \varphi. By Prop. 1 of No. 1, the homomorphisms of k0k_0-algebras φ~:A→C\tilde{\varphi} : A \to C such that π∘φ~=φ\pi \circ \tilde{\varphi} = \varphi are the mappings x↦v(dA(x))+φ~0(x)x \mapsto v(d_A(x)) + \tilde{\varphi}_0(x), where vv runs through HomA(Ωk0(A),N)\mathrm{Hom}_{A}(\Omega_{k_0}(A), N). It remains to choose vv in such a way that φ~\tilde{\varphi} is a homomorphism of kk-algebras. The mapping λ↦λ1C−φ~0(λ1A)\lambda \mapsto \lambda 1_C - \tilde{\varphi}_0(\lambda 1_A) is a k0k_0-derivation of kk into NN (loc. cit.), and therefore can be written h∘dkh \circ d_k with h∈Homk(Ωk0(k),N)h \in \mathrm{Hom}_k(\Omega_{k_0}(k), N).

Choose an integer rr such that the kernel of φ\varphi contains mr\mathfrak{m}^r. The AA-module NN is annihilated by mr\mathfrak{m}^r, and it is enough to take for vv the composite of the sequence of homomorphisms

Ωk0(A)⟶A/mr⊗AΩk0(A)→urA/mr⊗kΩk0(k)→h′N, \Omega_{k_0}(A) \longrightarrow A/\mathfrak{m}^r \otimes_{A} \Omega_{k_0}(A) \xrightarrow{u_r} A/\mathfrak{m}^r \otimes_k \Omega_{k_0}(k) \xrightarrow{h'} N ,
where h′h' is deduced from hh. In fact, for λ∈k\lambda \in k one has:
v(dA(λ1A))=h′ur(1⊗dA(λ1A))=h′(1⊗dk(λ))=h(dk(λ))=λ1C−φ~0(λ1A). v(d_A(\lambda 1_A)) = h'u_r(1 \otimes d_A(\lambda 1_A)) = h'(1 \otimes d_k(\lambda)) = h(d_k(\lambda)) = \lambda 1_C - \tilde{\varphi}_0(\lambda 1_A) .

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.