Theorem 4
Tag 0D9Q, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0D9Q].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 7. Algèbres lisses
Let A be a noetherian ring and B an A-algebra essentially of finite type. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) the A-algebra B is formally smooth ; (ii) for every , the A-algebra is formally smooth (resp. formally smooth for the -adic topology) ; (iii) the A-module B is flat and, for every , the is absolutely regular ; (iv) the A-module B is flat and, for every regular A-algebra R, the ring is regular ; (v) the A-module B is flat and the kernel of the homomorphism such that is a completely secant ideal.
The equivalence of (i) and (ii) follows from cor. 2 of th. 3 (No. 9).
(i)⇒(v) : suppose the A-algebra B formally smooth. Let q be a prime ideal of B, and p its inverse image in A. The -algebra is formally smooth (prop. 4, a) of No. 2), hence flat (lemma 5) ; consequently the A-module B is flat (II, § 3, No. 4, prop. 15). On the other hand, the ring is noetherian (§ 6, No. 1, cor. of prop. 2), hence the ideal is completely secant by cor. 3 of th. 2 (No. 5).
(v)⇒(iii) : suppose condition (v) satisfied. Put . Let . The mapping
is identified with the mapping
deduced from the multiplication of the . The ideal is identified with . It is completely secant since the A-module B is flat (§ 5, No. 6, prop. 6). Assertion (iii) then follows from prop. 8 of § 6, No. 5.
(iii)⇒(ii) : let q be a prime ideal of B, and p its inverse image in A. Under the hypotheses of (iii), the -module is flat, and the , which is identified with a ring of fractions of , is absolutely regular (§ 6, No. 4, prop. 6). It follows from lemma 5 that is formally smooth over , hence over A (No. 2, prop. 3 and 4).
(iii)⇒(iv) : let us place ourselves under the hypotheses of (iii). Let R be a regular A-algebra. The R-module is flat (I, § 2, No. 7, cor. 2 to prop. 8). Let r be a prime ideal of R and p its inverse image in A ; the ring , which is identified with , is regular (§ 6, No. 4, cor. 2 of prop. 7). The ring is therefore regular (§ 4, No. 5, cor. of prop. 9).
(iv) ⇒ (iii) : let be a prime ideal of and let be an extension of ; under the hypotheses of (iv), the ring , which is identified with , is regular, whence (iii).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.