Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 0DIQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DIQ].

Algebra, chapter IX, § 1. Formes sesquilinéaires

A mapping Φ\Phi of the product E×FE \times F into GG is said to be bilinear if it satisfies the following conditions:

(1) Φ(x+x′,y)=Φ(x,y)+Φ(x′,y)\Phi(x + x', y) = \Phi(x, y) + \Phi(x', y) for all x∈Ex \in E, x′∈Ex' \in E, y∈Fy \in F ; (2) Φ(x,y+y′)=Φ(x,y)+Φ(x,y′)\Phi(x, y + y') = \Phi(x, y) + \Phi(x, y') for all x∈Ex \in E, y∈Fy \in F, y′∈Fy' \in F ; (3) Φ(ax,y)=aΦ(x,y)\Phi(ax, y) = a\Phi(x, y) for all a∈Aa \in A, x∈Ex \in E, y∈Fy \in F ; (4) Φ(x,yb)=Φ(x,y)b\Phi(x, yb) = \Phi(x, y)b for all x∈Ex \in E, y∈Fy \in F, b∈Bb \in B.

The tensor product E⊗ZFE \otimes_{\mathbf{Z}} F is canonically endowed with a structure of (A,B)(A, B)-bimodule characterized by a(x⊗y)b=ax⊗yba(x \otimes y)b = ax \otimes yb (Chap. III, 2e éd., App. II, n° 3), and the giving of a bilinear mapping Φ\Phi of E×FE \times F into GG is equivalent to that of a mapping Ψ\Psi of E⊗ZFE \otimes_{\mathbf{Z}} F into GG which is a homomorphism for the structures of (A,B)(A, B)-bimodules and which satisfies Ψ(x⊗y)=Φ(x,y)\Psi(x \otimes y) = \Phi(x, y) for all x∈Ex \in E and y∈Fy \in F.

The conditions imposed on Φ\Phi by Definition 1 signify that the partial mappings dΦ(y):x→Φ(x,y)d_\Phi(y) : x \to \Phi(x, y) and sΦ(x):y→Φ(x,y)s_\Phi(x) : y \to \Phi(x, y) are respectively an A-linear mapping from EE into GG and a B-linear mapping from FF into GG. Let us endow the commutative group LA(E,G)\mathscr{L}_A(E, G) (resp. LB(F,G)\mathscr{L}_B(F, G)) with the structure of right B-module (resp. left A-module) defined by ub(x)=u(x).bub(x) = u(x) . b (u∈LA(E,G)u \in \mathscr{L}_A(E, G), x∈Ex \in E, b∈Bb \in B) (resp. aν(y)=a.ν(y)a \nu(y) = a . \nu(y) (a∈Aa \in A, ν∈LB(F,G)\nu \in \mathscr{L}_B(F, G), y∈Fy \in F)). Then conditions (1) to (4) are respectively equivalent to:

(1′)sΦ(x+x′)=sΦ(x)+sΦ(x′)(2′)dΦ(y+y′)=dΦ(y)+dΦ(y′)(3′)sΦ(ax)=a.sΦ(x)(4′)dΦ(yb)=dΦ(y).b, \begin{align*} (1') & \quad s_\Phi(x + x') = s_\Phi(x) + s_\Phi(x') \\ (2') & \quad d_\Phi(y + y') = d_\Phi(y) + d_\Phi(y') \\ (3') & \quad s_\Phi(ax) = a.s_\Phi(x) \\ (4') & \quad d_\Phi(yb) = d_\Phi(y).b, \end{align*}

for all x,x′x, x' in EE, y,y′y, y' in FF, a∈Aa \in A, b∈Bb \in B; in other words, the mapping dΦd_\Phi from FF into LA(E,G)\mathscr{L}_A(E, G) is B-linear, and the mapping sΦs_\Phi from EE into LB(F,G)\mathscr{L}_B(F, G) is A-linear. We have, by definition

(5)Φ(x,y)=dΦ(y)(x)=sΦ(x)(y) for all x∈E,y∈F.(5) \quad \Phi(x, y) = d_\Phi(y)(x) = s_\Phi(x)(y) \text{ for all } x \in E, y \in F.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.