A mapping Φ of the product E×F into G is said to be bilinear if it satisfies the following conditions:
(1) Φ(x+x′,y)=Φ(x,y)+Φ(x′,y) for all x∈E, x′∈E, y∈F ; (2) Φ(x,y+y′)=Φ(x,y)+Φ(x,y′) for all x∈E, y∈F, y′∈F ; (3) Φ(ax,y)=aΦ(x,y) for all a∈A, x∈E, y∈F ; (4) Φ(x,yb)=Φ(x,y)b for all x∈E, y∈F, b∈B.
The tensor product E⊗ZF is canonically endowed with a structure of (A,B)-bimodule characterized by a(x⊗y)b=ax⊗yb (Chap. III, 2e éd., App. II, n° 3), and the giving of a bilinear mapping Φ of E×F into G is equivalent to that of a mapping Ψ of E⊗ZF into G which is a homomorphism for the structures of (A,B)-bimodules and which satisfies Ψ(x⊗y)=Φ(x,y) for all x∈E and y∈F.
The conditions imposed on Φ by Definition 1 signify that the partial mappings dΦ(y):x→Φ(x,y) and sΦ(x):y→Φ(x,y) are respectively an A-linear mapping from E into G and a B-linear mapping from F into G. Let us endow the commutative group LA(E,G) (resp. LB(F,G)) with the structure of right B-module (resp. left A-module) defined by ub(x)=u(x).b (u∈LA(E,G), x∈E, b∈B) (resp. aν(y)=a.ν(y) (a∈A, ν∈LB(F,G), y∈F)). Then conditions (1) to (4) are respectively equivalent to:
(1′)(2′)(3′)(4′)sΦ(x+x′)=sΦ(x)+sΦ(x′)dΦ(y+y′)=dΦ(y)+dΦ(y′)sΦ(ax)=a.sΦ(x)dΦ(yb)=dΦ(y).b,
for all x,x′ in E, y,y′ in F, a∈A, b∈B; in other words, the mapping dΦ from F into LA(E,G) is B-linear, and the mapping sΦ from E into LB(F,G) is A-linear. We have, by definition
(5)Φ(x,y)=dΦ(y)(x)=sΦ(x)(y) for all x∈E,y∈F.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.